Analysis of different demand response strategies for a Finnish apartment building utilizing waste heat from hydrogen production

The increasing demand for sustainable energy solutions encourages the incorporation of more renewable energies in energy systems. Among these, district heating systems, widely implemented across northern and central Europe, offer great potential in integrating renewable energies. As hydrogen production expands, the excess heat generated during this process presents a promising opportunity for recovery and utilization in district heating. Since demand response has proven valuable in the share of renewables, this study analyzed the building-level benefits of demand response control strategies based on dynamic district heat prices integrated with waste heat from hydrogen production. Three demand response control strategies were developed, which controlled the inlet water temperatures of water radiators, indoor air temperatures, and charging actions of a DHW storage tank, separately. The results illustrate their economic potential on a Finnish district-heated apartment building. The advantage of centralized demand response control is that it does not increase peak heating demand. The results demonstrate that the decentralized demand response control has the highest annual district heat energy cost saving, up to 4.9 %. The dynamic storage tank charging control cuts the peak heat power significantly, with a great reduction of the power fee by a maximum of 22.6% power fee reduction with a 5.2 m 3 tank. In addition, the results in the pay-back period analysis provide recommended maximum investment under different control strategies and target pay-back years. • Hydrogen production waste heat was employed in district heating • Three demand response control strategies were analyzed • The impact of two power fee tariffs was investigated • There are up to 4.9% of energy cost saving and 22.6% of power fee reduction • Possible maximum investment costs under different payback periods were calculated

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2026.140439
Primary Topic
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of different demand response strategies for a Finnish apartment building utilizing waste heat from hydrogen production

Perttu Karjalainen, Yuchen Ju, Antti Kosonen, Juha Jokisalo et al.
Energy
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
article

Analysis of different demand response strategies for a Finnish apartment building utilizing waste heat from hydrogen production

Perttu Karjalainen, Yuchen Ju, Antti Kosonen, Juha Jokisalo, Altti Meriläinen, Risto Kosonen
article en

Abstract

The increasing demand for sustainable energy solutions encourages the incorporation of more renewable energies in energy systems. Among these, district heating systems, widely implemented across northern and central Europe, offer great potential in integrating renewable energies. As hydrogen production expands, the excess heat generated during this process presents a promising opportunity for recovery and utilization in district heating. Since demand response has proven valuable in the share of renewables, this study analyzed the building-level benefits of demand response control strategies based on dynamic district heat prices integrated with waste heat from hydrogen production. Three demand response control strategies were developed, which controlled the inlet water temperatures of water radiators, indoor air temperatures, and charging actions of a DHW storage tank, separately. The results illustrate their economic potential on a Finnish district-heated apartment building. The advantage of centralized demand response control is that it does not increase peak heating demand. The results demonstrate that the decentralized demand response control has the highest annual district heat energy cost saving, up to 4.9 %. The dynamic storage tank charging control cuts the peak heat power significantly, with a great reduction of the power fee by a maximum of 22.6% power fee reduction with a 5.2 m 3 tank. In addition, the results in the pay-back period analysis provide recommended maximum investment under different control strategies and target pay-back years. • Hydrogen production waste heat was employed in district heating • Three demand response control strategies were analyzed • The impact of two power fee tariffs was investigated • There are up to 4.9% of energy cost saving and 22.6% of power fee reduction • Possible maximum investment costs under different payback periods were calculated

EnergyVol. 347
Granlund (Finland) (FI), Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology (FI), Aalto University (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.