Matrix effects on secondary ion emissions for H and OH from natural spinel-structured oxides: Implications for H2O quantification by secondary ion mass spectrometry

Abstract Spinel-structured oxides (hereafter “spinels”) are a group of nominally anhydrous minerals characterized by a wide range of solid solution. To allow the analysis of hydrogen in spinels by secondary ion mass spectrometry, Relative Sensitivity Factors (RSFs), which are typically matrix-dependent, need to be determined. For this work, we have selected 11 natural spinels from the Mg-Al-Fe-Ti-Cr-Mn-Zn compositional space, ranging in density from 3.7 to > 5.1 g cm-3. This is the first attempt to determine 2H and 16O2H RSF values in several crystals with different cation compositions. Samples were implanted with a fixed dose of deuterium (1 × 1015 atoms cm-2) using an ion energy of 40 keV. Subsequently, we performed depth profiling using a Cs+ primary beam on a CAMECA IMS 1280–HR ion microprobe, monitoring secondary ions of 2H- and 16O2H- until the implanted ion intensities dropped below background levels. From the reduced data, we calculated the RSFs for 2H and 16O2H relative to 18O as matrix element. RSF values vary with Al2O3 content. RSFs for 2H yield 2.53 ± 0.99 (2SE) × 1022 atoms cm-3 at Al2O3 < 2 wt% and 1.49 ± 0.51 (2SE) × 1022 atoms cm-3 at Al2O3 ≥ 10 wt%. RSFs for 16O2H relative to 18O range from 2.59 × 1020 atoms cm-3 to 2.51 × 1021 atoms cm-3and increase with increasing Al2O3 content. Preliminary RSF data for 16O2H relative to 18O (Zellmer et al., 2025a) closely matches the data presented here, and taken together, the RSF for 16O2H relative to 18O follows a second order polynomial relationship with Al2O3 content: RSF=1.516×1017Al2O32+2.121×1019Al2O3+2.758×1020where the RSF is in atoms cm-3 and Al2O3 is in wt%. Along this polynomial relationship, the relative standard error is about 23% (2SE). The overall lower RSF values of the dimer and the lower standard errors of the mean indicate that the analysis of hydrogen in spinels is best undertaken through the analysis of OH rather than H. This script therefore provides a method to calculate the hydrogen concentration, [H], in spinel structured oxides, given by: [H]=C1H×106M/(ρ×NA)where square brackets denote concentration in μg/g, M is the molar mass of 1H (∼1.008 g mol–1), ρ is the density of the spinel in question (in g cm-3), and NA is the Avogadro constant (∼6.022 × 1023 atoms mol-1).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Mineralogist
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2025-10129
Primary Topic
X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Matrix effects on secondary ion emissions for H and OH from natural spinel-structured oxides: Implications for H2O quantification by secondary ion mass spectrometry

Frédéric Couffignal, Maria Rosa Scicchitano, Takeshi Kuritani, Isao Sakaguchi et al.
American Mineralogist
X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
article

Matrix effects on secondary ion emissions for H and OH from natural spinel-structured oxides: Implications for H2O quantification by secondary ion mass spectrometry

Frédéric Couffignal, Maria Rosa Scicchitano, Takeshi Kuritani, Isao Sakaguchi, Georg Florian Zellmer
article en

Abstract

Abstract Spinel-structured oxides (hereafter “spinels”) are a group of nominally anhydrous minerals characterized by a wide range of solid solution. To allow the analysis of hydrogen in spinels by secondary ion mass spectrometry, Relative Sensitivity Factors (RSFs), which are typically matrix-dependent, need to be determined. For this work, we have selected 11 natural spinels from the Mg-Al-Fe-Ti-Cr-Mn-Zn compositional space, ranging in density from 3.7 to > 5.1 g cm-3. This is the first attempt to determine 2H and 16O2H RSF values in several crystals with different cation compositions. Samples were implanted with a fixed dose of deuterium (1 × 1015 atoms cm-2) using an ion energy of 40 keV. Subsequently, we performed depth profiling using a Cs+ primary beam on a CAMECA IMS 1280–HR ion microprobe, monitoring secondary ions of 2H- and 16O2H- until the implanted ion intensities dropped below background levels. From the reduced data, we calculated the RSFs for 2H and 16O2H relative to 18O as matrix element. RSF values vary with Al2O3 content. RSFs for 2H yield 2.53 ± 0.99 (2SE) × 1022 atoms cm-3 at Al2O3 < 2 wt% and 1.49 ± 0.51 (2SE) × 1022 atoms cm-3 at Al2O3 ≥ 10 wt%. RSFs for 16O2H relative to 18O range from 2.59 × 1020 atoms cm-3 to 2.51 × 1021 atoms cm-3and increase with increasing Al2O3 content. Preliminary RSF data for 16O2H relative to 18O (Zellmer et al., 2025a) closely matches the data presented here, and taken together, the RSF for 16O2H relative to 18O follows a second order polynomial relationship with Al2O3 content: RSF=1.516×1017Al2O32+2.121×1019Al2O3+2.758×1020where the RSF is in atoms cm-3 and Al2O3 is in wt%. Along this polynomial relationship, the relative standard error is about 23% (2SE). The overall lower RSF values of the dimer and the lower standard errors of the mean indicate that the analysis of hydrogen in spinels is best undertaken through the analysis of OH rather than H. This script therefore provides a method to calculate the hydrogen concentration, [H], in spinel structured oxides, given by: [H]=C1H×106M/(ρ×NA)where square brackets denote concentration in μg/g, M is the molar mass of 1H (∼1.008 g mol–1), ρ is the density of the spinel in question (in g cm-3), and NA is the Avogadro constant (∼6.022 × 1023 atoms mol-1).

American Mineralogist
University of Bonn (DE), Hokkaido University (JP), National Institute for Materials Science (JP), GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.