Towards <scp>SDG</scp> 7 and <scp>SDG</scp> 13: How Environmental Policies and Renewable Energy Drive Low‐Carbon Growth in the Emerging‐Seven Nations

ABSTRACT Striking an equilibrium between swift economic expansion and ecological viability is a critical challenge for the E7 nations, which represent some of the world's most influential emerging economies. Achieving sustainable development requires these nations' industrialization to be coupled with a deep understanding of the factors that drive CO 2 emissions and affect ecological capacity. This study addresses this challenge by empirically examining the E7 countries, using two distinct models to explore the intricate relationships between economic growth, environmental policies, and sustainability. As a measure of environmental viability, the Load Capacity Factor (LCF) is an essential variable to investigate in the second model, whereas the first model seeks to determine what causes emissions of carbon dioxide, a sign of environmental degradation. As far as the models are concerned, the primary explanatory variables are the following: environmental policy stringency (EPS), renewable energy consumption (REC), and GDP (gross domestic product). Autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL), panel‐corrected standard errors (PCSE), feasible generalized least squares (FGLS), and Driscoll‐Kraay standard errors (DKSE) are some of the advanced econometric methods used in the study. These methods allow for the capture of both short‐run and long‐run dynamics during 1990–2022. The results show that GDP boosts CO 2 emissions in the short run, but in the long run, it shows an inverted U connection, which confirms the EKC theory. Stricter environmental regulations greatly improve ecological capacity, which EPS helps with, but their impact is larger on LCF improvement, which in turn helps to reduce emissions. According to the REC coefficient, the evolution to renewable energy in the E7 nations is still in its early stages, which can be characterized by higher emissions at times due to technical and infrastructure constraints, but ultimately leads to better sustainability results. GDP weakens the Load Capacity Curve (LCC) hypothesis, but EPS and REC strengthen it. These findings suggest that renewable energy sources and regulations regarding the environment must be changed to create a growth‐sustainability balance. The findings offer evidence‐based approaches to reduce CO 2 emissions and enhance ecological capacity in developing economies, influencing the seven member states' attempts to align their economic development goals with SDGs, predominantly SDG 13 and SDG 7.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Development
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70776
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards SDG 7 and SDG 13: How Environmental Policies and Renewable Energy Drive Low‐Carbon Growth in the Emerging‐Seven Nations

Alfie Blake, Ting Cao
Sustainable Development
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

Towards SDG 7 and SDG 13: How Environmental Policies and Renewable Energy Drive Low‐Carbon Growth in the Emerging‐Seven Nations

Alfie Blake, Ting Cao
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Striking an equilibrium between swift economic expansion and ecological viability is a critical challenge for the E7 nations, which represent some of the world's most influential emerging economies. Achieving sustainable development requires these nations' industrialization to be coupled with a deep understanding of the factors that drive CO 2 emissions and affect ecological capacity. This study addresses this challenge by empirically examining the E7 countries, using two distinct models to explore the intricate relationships between economic growth, environmental policies, and sustainability. As a measure of environmental viability, the Load Capacity Factor (LCF) is an essential variable to investigate in the second model, whereas the first model seeks to determine what causes emissions of carbon dioxide, a sign of environmental degradation. As far as the models are concerned, the primary explanatory variables are the following: environmental policy stringency (EPS), renewable energy consumption (REC), and GDP (gross domestic product). Autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL), panel‐corrected standard errors (PCSE), feasible generalized least squares (FGLS), and Driscoll‐Kraay standard errors (DKSE) are some of the advanced econometric methods used in the study. These methods allow for the capture of both short‐run and long‐run dynamics during 1990–2022. The results show that GDP boosts CO 2 emissions in the short run, but in the long run, it shows an inverted U connection, which confirms the EKC theory. Stricter environmental regulations greatly improve ecological capacity, which EPS helps with, but their impact is larger on LCF improvement, which in turn helps to reduce emissions. According to the REC coefficient, the evolution to renewable energy in the E7 nations is still in its early stages, which can be characterized by higher emissions at times due to technical and infrastructure constraints, but ultimately leads to better sustainability results. GDP weakens the Load Capacity Curve (LCC) hypothesis, but EPS and REC strengthen it. These findings suggest that renewable energy sources and regulations regarding the environment must be changed to create a growth‐sustainability balance. The findings offer evidence‐based approaches to reduce CO 2 emissions and enhance ecological capacity in developing economies, influencing the seven member states' attempts to align their economic development goals with SDGs, predominantly SDG 13 and SDG 7.

Sustainable Development
Westminster University (US), Zhengzhou Business University (CN)
National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.