Development, reliability, and concurrent validity of the virtual box and block test for manual dexterity and kinematic analysis in stroke patients and healthy adults

We developed a hand kinematics analysis method for manual dexterity in post-stroke patients, utilizing real-time tracking and three-dimensional (3D) visualization of movement performance through a virtual box and block test (BBT) with a leap motion controller; additionally, we validated its reliability and concurrent validity to propose it as a valuable evaluation tool. We performed virtual-BBT for 1 min in a stroke patient group (SPG, n = 15) and a healthy adult group (HAG, n = 15). Virtual-BBT was tracked in real time, and cubes were counted by holding the virtual cube and performing hand movements. The test–retest reliability by number of trials showed significant correlation in the SPG (less paretic: intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.582, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.104–0.839], p < 0.01; more paretic: ICC = 0.634, 95% CI [0.191–0.861], p < 0.001) and in the HAG (dominant: ICC = 0.605, 95% CI [0.134–0.851], p < 0.01; non-dominant: ICC = 0.739, 95% CI [0.379–0.904], p < 0.01). The concurrent validity of virtual and real-BBT showed large correlation for less paretic (r = 0.76, p < 0.001) and paretic (r = 0.86, p < 0.001) hands in the SPG. The dominant (r = 0.73, p = 0.002) and non-dominant (r = 0.75, p < 0.001) hands in the HAG showed large correlation. Virtual-BBT analyzes manual dexterity characteristics in 3D by holding a virtual cube and tracking movement performance, and reduces the subjectivity of classical evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Virtual Reality
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-026-01329-y
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development, reliability, and concurrent validity of the virtual box and block test for manual dexterity and kinematic analysis in stroke patients and healthy adults

S.M. Kim, Onseok Lee, Sanghun Jang, Subok Kim
Virtual Reality
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
article

Development, reliability, and concurrent validity of the virtual box and block test for manual dexterity and kinematic analysis in stroke patients and healthy adults

S.M. Kim, Onseok Lee, Sanghun Jang, Subok Kim
article en

Abstract

We developed a hand kinematics analysis method for manual dexterity in post-stroke patients, utilizing real-time tracking and three-dimensional (3D) visualization of movement performance through a virtual box and block test (BBT) with a leap motion controller; additionally, we validated its reliability and concurrent validity to propose it as a valuable evaluation tool. We performed virtual-BBT for 1 min in a stroke patient group (SPG, n = 15) and a healthy adult group (HAG, n = 15). Virtual-BBT was tracked in real time, and cubes were counted by holding the virtual cube and performing hand movements. The test–retest reliability by number of trials showed significant correlation in the SPG (less paretic: intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.582, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.104–0.839], p < 0.01; more paretic: ICC = 0.634, 95% CI [0.191–0.861], p < 0.001) and in the HAG (dominant: ICC = 0.605, 95% CI [0.134–0.851], p < 0.01; non-dominant: ICC = 0.739, 95% CI [0.379–0.904], p < 0.01). The concurrent validity of virtual and real-BBT showed large correlation for less paretic (r = 0.76, p < 0.001) and paretic (r = 0.86, p < 0.001) hands in the SPG. The dominant (r = 0.73, p = 0.002) and non-dominant (r = 0.75, p < 0.001) hands in the HAG showed large correlation. Virtual-BBT analyzes manual dexterity characteristics in 3D by holding a virtual cube and tracking movement performance, and reduces the subjectivity of classical evaluation.

Virtual RealityVol. 30(2)
Korea National University of Transportation (KR), Soonchunhyang University (KR), Gimcheon University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.