Proclaiming a psychological assessment tool is “reliable, valid, and ethical” doth not make it so: A reply to Stein et al. (2026) and Jenkins (2026).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychological Assessment
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001451
Primary Topic
Psychological Testing and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proclaiming a psychological assessment tool is “reliable, valid, and ethical” doth not make it so: A reply to Stein et al. (2026) and Jenkins (2026).

Kiefer Cowie, Kelly Shea, Greg Haggerty, Samuel Justin Sinclair et al.
Psychological Assessment
Psychological Testing and Assessment
article

Proclaiming a psychological assessment tool is “reliable, valid, and ethical” doth not make it so: A reply to Stein et al. (2026) and Jenkins (2026).

Kiefer Cowie, Kelly Shea, Greg Haggerty, Samuel Justin Sinclair, Kris L. Shea
article en

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.
Psychological AssessmentVol. 38(3)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA), University of Hartford (US), John T. Mather Memorial Hospital (US), Children's Hospital of The King's Daughters (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Psychological Testing and Assessment
DOISourceOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.