The Diagnostic Evolution of Haematological Neoplasms: A Narrative Review of the Road to Two Genetically Focused Classification Systems Through a Resource-Limited Perspective

<b>Introduction:</b> Classification of haematological malignancies has evolved over centuries from multiple morphology-based classifications to a single consensus classification, the World Health Organisation (WHO) classification of tumours in 2001, which included clinical history and immunophenotype. The next two decades saw a revised WHO classification, incorporating immunophenotyping, cytogenetics, molecular genetics, morphology, and clinical features. In 2022, the WHO classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours fifth edition (WHO-HAEM5) and International Consensus Classification (ICC) integrated advanced genetic technologies. Navigating two classifications has caused uncertainty for pathologists and clinicians globally. However, there is added concern for low and middle income countries (LMICs), where diagnostic disparities compared to high income countries (HICs) already exist. The incorporation of advanced and costly genetic testing will likely widen this gap. This disparity and diagnostic evolution are the focus of this review. <b>Methods:</b> A literature search was performed for articles reporting on historical evolution of haematological malignancy diagnosis, diagnostic challenges for haematology in LMICs, haematological classification systems, overall survival, and laboratory turn-around times was performed using three scholarly databases; and a Google search was made for historic portions of this review. Ninety-two publications were included. <b>Results:</b> This narrative review describes the diagnostic and genetic evolution of haematological malignancies, and highlights disparities of laboratory diagnostics between LMICs and HICs. <b>Conclusions:</b> The existing disparities in diagnostic haematology between LMICs and HICs will likely widen due to the emphasis on advanced genetic testing in the WHO-HAEM5 and ICC. Advocacy for consistent accessibility and affordability of haematology diagnostics in LMICs is needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16040541
Primary Topic
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Diagnostic Evolution of Haematological Neoplasms: A Narrative Review of the Road to Two Genetically Focused Classification Systems Through a Resource-Limited Perspective

Nadine Rapiti, Caryn Benjamin, Z. Chapanduka
Diagnostics
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
article

The Diagnostic Evolution of Haematological Neoplasms: A Narrative Review of the Road to Two Genetically Focused Classification Systems Through a Resource-Limited Perspective

Nadine Rapiti, Caryn Benjamin, Z. Chapanduka
article en

Abstract

<b>Introduction:</b> Classification of haematological malignancies has evolved over centuries from multiple morphology-based classifications to a single consensus classification, the World Health Organisation (WHO) classification of tumours in 2001, which included clinical history and immunophenotype. The next two decades saw a revised WHO classification, incorporating immunophenotyping, cytogenetics, molecular genetics, morphology, and clinical features. In 2022, the WHO classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours fifth edition (WHO-HAEM5) and International Consensus Classification (ICC) integrated advanced genetic technologies. Navigating two classifications has caused uncertainty for pathologists and clinicians globally. However, there is added concern for low and middle income countries (LMICs), where diagnostic disparities compared to high income countries (HICs) already exist. The incorporation of advanced and costly genetic testing will likely widen this gap. This disparity and diagnostic evolution are the focus of this review. <b>Methods:</b> A literature search was performed for articles reporting on historical evolution of haematological malignancy diagnosis, diagnostic challenges for haematology in LMICs, haematological classification systems, overall survival, and laboratory turn-around times was performed using three scholarly databases; and a Google search was made for historic portions of this review. Ninety-two publications were included. <b>Results:</b> This narrative review describes the diagnostic and genetic evolution of haematological malignancies, and highlights disparities of laboratory diagnostics between LMICs and HICs. <b>Conclusions:</b> The existing disparities in diagnostic haematology between LMICs and HICs will likely widen due to the emphasis on advanced genetic testing in the WHO-HAEM5 and ICC. Advocacy for consistent accessibility and affordability of haematology diagnostics in LMICs is needed.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(4)
National Health Laboratory Service (ZA), Western Cape Department of Health (ZA), Stellenbosch University (ZA), University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.