Evaluation of a Novel Isothermal Microcalorimetry-Based Sterility Test

Abstract Parenteral drugs must meet strict release criteria to ensure patient safety upon administration. Sterility is a critical requirement, and is typically assessed using the compendial U.S. Pharmacopoeia (USP) <71> sterility test. However, with the growing demand to reduce batch release times, the test’s 14-day incubation period is becoming a concern, emphasizing the need for more rapid alternatives. Here, we compared the performance of the calScreener+ isothermal microcalorimetry (IMC) device (Symcel) to that of the compendial USP <71> sterility test, using a panel of sixteen microorganisms (six USP <71> reference strains and ten field isolates) in two inoculum sizes (100 and 5 CFU). The IMC-based method detected a higher number of positive samples compared to the compendial method (95.8% vs 87.5%; p < 0.05). Furthermore, IMC was consistently faster, reducing mean detection times from 43 hours to 19 hours at 100 CFU and from 46 hours to 28 hours at 5 CFU (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the calScreener+ IMC device shows promise as a rapid and sensitive alternative to the compendial sterility test, with the potential to speed up batch releases without compromising patient safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12247-026-10986-0
Primary Topic
thermodynamics and calorimetric analyses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Evaluation of a Novel Isothermal Microcalorimetry-Based Sterility Test

Tom Coenye, Indra Sioen
Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation
thermodynamics and calorimetric analyses
article

Evaluation of a Novel Isothermal Microcalorimetry-Based Sterility Test

Tom Coenye, Indra Sioen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Parenteral drugs must meet strict release criteria to ensure patient safety upon administration. Sterility is a critical requirement, and is typically assessed using the compendial U.S. Pharmacopoeia (USP) <71> sterility test. However, with the growing demand to reduce batch release times, the test’s 14-day incubation period is becoming a concern, emphasizing the need for more rapid alternatives. Here, we compared the performance of the calScreener+ isothermal microcalorimetry (IMC) device (Symcel) to that of the compendial USP <71> sterility test, using a panel of sixteen microorganisms (six USP <71> reference strains and ten field isolates) in two inoculum sizes (100 and 5 CFU). The IMC-based method detected a higher number of positive samples compared to the compendial method (95.8% vs 87.5%; p < 0.05). Furthermore, IMC was consistently faster, reducing mean detection times from 43 hours to 19 hours at 100 CFU and from 46 hours to 28 hours at 5 CFU (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the calScreener+ IMC device shows promise as a rapid and sensitive alternative to the compendial sterility test, with the potential to speed up batch releases without compromising patient safety.

Journal of Pharmaceutical InnovationVol. 22(1)
Ghent University (BE)
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Vlaamse regering
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
thermodynamics and calorimetric analyses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of a Novel Isothermal Microcalorimetry-Based Sterility Test — Tom Coenye, Indra Sioen · Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS