Impact of a substance use screening program on racial disparities in urine toxicology testing

Abstract Objective To evaluate whether implementing a standardized substance use screening program reduced racial disparities in urine toxicology (Utox) testing among delivery admissions. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of delivery admissions at a single academic center from June 2019 to June 2025. To address known disparities in Utox testing, a standardized iPad‐based screening tool using a modified 4Ps screen was implemented February–May 2023. Screening responses triggered protocolized Utox testing based on a predefined algorithm. Clinical and demographic predictors of Utox testing were compared pre‐ and post‐implementation using chi‐square and t ‐tests. Logistic regression with predictor × era interaction terms assessed changes in associations with testing; final models were adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, parity, and insurance. Results Among 36,656 admissions, 216 (0.59%) underwent Utox testing: 181 (0.80%) pre‐implementation and 32 (0.26%) post‐implementation. Pre‐implementation, Black patients accounted for 26.8% of tests but only 7.0% of the population. Post‐implementation, Black patients represented only 6.3% of tests and 6.5% of the population. The testing rate for Black patients declined from 3.2% to 0.5% ( p < 0.001). In unadjusted models, testing for effect modification by implementation period, race ( p = 0.02 for Black vs. White; interaction odds ratio [OR], 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05–0.66), and age ( p = 0.001; interaction OR 1.14; 95% CI, 1.06–1.23) showed significant interactions. In adjusted models, the disparity in testing by race significantly decreased post‐implementation (interaction adjusted OR [aOR] for Black vs. White 0.17; 95% CI 0.05–0.66; p = 0.01). Among those tested, positive Utox screens did not differ significantly by period (43.2% pre‐implementation vs. 56.3% post‐implementation, p = 0.11). Discussion Implementation of a standardized substance use screening tool was associated with a significant reduction in racial disparities in Utox testing at delivery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pregnancy
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pmf2.70247
Primary Topic
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of a substance use screening program on racial disparities in urine toxicology testing

Farnaaz Kia, Naomi Greene, Amin Tavakoli, Camelita Thrift et al.
Pregnancy
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
article

Impact of a substance use screening program on racial disparities in urine toxicology testing

Farnaaz Kia, Naomi Greene, Amin Tavakoli, Camelita Thrift, Jennifer Astasio, Mariam Naqvi, Allison G. Henry, Sarah J. Kilpatrick
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective To evaluate whether implementing a standardized substance use screening program reduced racial disparities in urine toxicology (Utox) testing among delivery admissions. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of delivery admissions at a single academic center from June 2019 to June 2025. To address known disparities in Utox testing, a standardized iPad‐based screening tool using a modified 4Ps screen was implemented February–May 2023. Screening responses triggered protocolized Utox testing based on a predefined algorithm. Clinical and demographic predictors of Utox testing were compared pre‐ and post‐implementation using chi‐square and t ‐tests. Logistic regression with predictor × era interaction terms assessed changes in associations with testing; final models were adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, parity, and insurance. Results Among 36,656 admissions, 216 (0.59%) underwent Utox testing: 181 (0.80%) pre‐implementation and 32 (0.26%) post‐implementation. Pre‐implementation, Black patients accounted for 26.8% of tests but only 7.0% of the population. Post‐implementation, Black patients represented only 6.3% of tests and 6.5% of the population. The testing rate for Black patients declined from 3.2% to 0.5% ( p < 0.001). In unadjusted models, testing for effect modification by implementation period, race ( p = 0.02 for Black vs. White; interaction odds ratio [OR], 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05–0.66), and age ( p = 0.001; interaction OR 1.14; 95% CI, 1.06–1.23) showed significant interactions. In adjusted models, the disparity in testing by race significantly decreased post‐implementation (interaction adjusted OR [aOR] for Black vs. White 0.17; 95% CI 0.05–0.66; p = 0.01). Among those tested, positive Utox screens did not differ significantly by period (43.2% pre‐implementation vs. 56.3% post‐implementation, p = 0.11). Discussion Implementation of a standardized substance use screening tool was associated with a significant reduction in racial disparities in Utox testing at delivery.

PregnancyVol. 2(2)
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.