Robustness and Renewal as key dynamic capabilities for corporate resilience

This study examines how robustness and renewal capabilities jointly determine firm resilience across the complete COVID-19 life-cycle crisis. Using survey data from 4100 firms worldwide and structural equation modelling, we analyse resilience dynamics across both the acute disruption phase and the subsequent recovery phase. The results confirm a sequential relationship: robustness capabilities significantly support short-term performance stability, while renewal capabilities drive post-crisis performance recovery. The interaction between both capabilities further amplifies sustainable performance outcomes, highlighting the importance of managing resilience as a dynamic capability process rather than a static attribute. Research rigour is ensured through multiple robustness checks, measurement validation and alternative model specifications. The findings contribute to the literature on resilience and stakeholder-driven strategies and offer managerial guidance on capability deployment before, during, and after major disruptions

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Research on Management and Business Economics
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2026.100308
Primary Topic
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robustness and Renewal as key dynamic capabilities for corporate resilience

Jacques Bughin
European Research on Management and Business Economics
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
article

Robustness and Renewal as key dynamic capabilities for corporate resilience

Jacques Bughin
article en

Abstract

This study examines how robustness and renewal capabilities jointly determine firm resilience across the complete COVID-19 life-cycle crisis. Using survey data from 4100 firms worldwide and structural equation modelling, we analyse resilience dynamics across both the acute disruption phase and the subsequent recovery phase. The results confirm a sequential relationship: robustness capabilities significantly support short-term performance stability, while renewal capabilities drive post-crisis performance recovery. The interaction between both capabilities further amplifies sustainable performance outcomes, highlighting the importance of managing resilience as a dynamic capability process rather than a static attribute. Research rigour is ensured through multiple robustness checks, measurement validation and alternative model specifications. The findings contribute to the literature on resilience and stakeholder-driven strategies and offer managerial guidance on capability deployment before, during, and after major disruptions

European Research on Management and Business EconomicsVol. 32(2)
Solvay (Belgium) (BE)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Robustness and Renewal as key dynamic capabilities for corporate resilience — Jacques Bughin · European Research on Management and Business Economics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS