Understanding the reasons why students fail to submit assignments

This research investigates why undergraduates at a widening-participation institution in the UK fail to submit assignments and whether the reasons differ by ethnicity. This addresses two issues current in higher education: student attrition, which has been shown to correlate positively with non-submission of assignments; and the ‘awarding gap’ between Black and White students: the difference in the percentage of ‘good’ degrees (first or upper-second class) awarded to each ethnic group. Previous research has identified the problem of non-submission and the demographic profile of those more likely not to submit assignments. However, very few studies have explored the reasons why. Eighty-eight students provided their reasons for not submitting an assignment through an open-ended question within a survey. Thematic analysis revealed that students’ reasons fell into three categories: situational, dispositional and institutional. Two-thirds of the reasons for non-submission were situational, including health, mental health and family and caring responsibilities. As many situational factors could be accommodated by students applying for extensions and mitigating circumstances, institutions should explore why often students do not make use of these processes. Another frequently cited factor was the timing of assignment deadlines, which is of interest to those with responsibility for planning the student workload. Comparing ethnicities, White students were significantly more likely to report health-related reasons for non-submission than their Black counterparts. Further research is needed to explore this finding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Education
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-026-01186-6
Primary Topic
Higher Education Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the reasons why students fail to submit assignments

Alison Loddick, Samantha King
Discover Education
Higher Education Research Studies
article

Understanding the reasons why students fail to submit assignments

Alison Loddick, Samantha King
article en

Abstract

This research investigates why undergraduates at a widening-participation institution in the UK fail to submit assignments and whether the reasons differ by ethnicity. This addresses two issues current in higher education: student attrition, which has been shown to correlate positively with non-submission of assignments; and the ‘awarding gap’ between Black and White students: the difference in the percentage of ‘good’ degrees (first or upper-second class) awarded to each ethnic group. Previous research has identified the problem of non-submission and the demographic profile of those more likely not to submit assignments. However, very few studies have explored the reasons why. Eighty-eight students provided their reasons for not submitting an assignment through an open-ended question within a survey. Thematic analysis revealed that students’ reasons fell into three categories: situational, dispositional and institutional. Two-thirds of the reasons for non-submission were situational, including health, mental health and family and caring responsibilities. As many situational factors could be accommodated by students applying for extensions and mitigating circumstances, institutions should explore why often students do not make use of these processes. Another frequently cited factor was the timing of assignment deadlines, which is of interest to those with responsibility for planning the student workload. Comparing ethnicities, White students were significantly more likely to report health-related reasons for non-submission than their Black counterparts. Further research is needed to explore this finding.

Discover EducationVol. 5(1)
University of Northampton (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Higher Education Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.