From AI to authorship: Exploring the use of LLM detection tools for calling on “originality” of students in academic environments

As generative AI (GenAI) continues to permeate academia, distinguishing between student-authored essays and those by Large Language Models (LLMs) becomes crucial for maintaining academic integrity. This study conducted a survey on the ethical awareness of using generative AI tools among a group of STEM students (n=156). Also, we empirically evaluate the effectiveness of state-of-the-art LLM detector in identifying essays written by LLMs versus those written independently by students. We separated students into two groups and assigned them to either use LLMs or write essay independently. The essays were collected, anonymised, and analysed using quantitative methods. The detection tools were assessed on their ability to classify the essays correctly. The findings highlight limitations of the deployment of LLM detection tools in writing courses. Based on the outcomes, recommendations are provided for educators to enhance the ethical use of detection technologies. Our code is available on GitHub

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-291402
Primary Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From AI to authorship: Exploring the use of LLM detection tools for calling on “originality” of students in academic environments

Qinghao Guan, Yangxi Han
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Academic integrity and plagiarism
article

From AI to authorship: Exploring the use of LLM detection tools for calling on “originality” of students in academic environments

Qinghao Guan, Yangxi Han
article en

Abstract

As generative AI (GenAI) continues to permeate academia, distinguishing between student-authored essays and those by Large Language Models (LLMs) becomes crucial for maintaining academic integrity. This study conducted a survey on the ethical awareness of using generative AI tools among a group of STEM students (n=156). Also, we empirically evaluate the effectiveness of state-of-the-art LLM detector in identifying essays written by LLMs versus those written independently by students. We separated students into two groups and assigned them to either use LLMs or write essay independently. The essays were collected, anonymised, and analysed using quantitative methods. The detection tools were assessed on their ability to classify the essays correctly. The findings highlight limitations of the deployment of LLM detection tools in writing courses. Based on the outcomes, recommendations are provided for educators to enhance the ethical use of detection technologies. Our code is available on GitHub

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Academic integrity and plagiarism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.