Comparing the Mechanical and Thermodynamic Definitions of Pressure in Ice Nucleation

Crystal nucleation studies using hard-sphere and Lennard-Jones models have shown that the actual (mechanical) pressure within the nucleus is lower than that in the surrounding liquid. Here, we use the mechanical route to obtain the pressure for an ice nucleus in supercooled water (TIP4P/Ice) at 1 bar and 247 K. From this pressure, we obtain the interfacial stress using a thermodynamic definition consistent with mechanical arguments. Moreover, we compare the mechanical pressure with the thermodynamic pressure of bulk ice at an equal chemical potential and the interfacial stress with the interfacial free energy. Furthermore, we investigate these properties on the basal plane. We find that unlike in hard-sphere and Lennard-Jones systems, mechanical and thermodynamic pressures agree for the nucleus, and the interfacial stress and free energy are comparable. However, the basal interface displays an interfacial stress nearly twice its interfacial free energy, suggesting that this agreement may be dependent on the system, underscoring the limitations of mechanical routes to solid-liquid interfacial free energies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5c03700
Citations
2
Primary Topic
nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
81.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing the Mechanical and Thermodynamic Definitions of Pressure in Ice Nucleation

Kaihang Shi, Christoph Dellago, Carlos Vega, P. Montero de Hijes
2 citations
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
81.28
article

Comparing the Mechanical and Thermodynamic Definitions of Pressure in Ice Nucleation

Kaihang Shi, Christoph Dellago, Carlos Vega, P. Montero de Hijes
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Crystal nucleation studies using hard-sphere and Lennard-Jones models have shown that the actual (mechanical) pressure within the nucleus is lower than that in the surrounding liquid. Here, we use the mechanical route to obtain the pressure for an ice nucleus in supercooled water (TIP4P/Ice) at 1 bar and 247 K. From this pressure, we obtain the interfacial stress using a thermodynamic definition consistent with mechanical arguments. Moreover, we compare the mechanical pressure with the thermodynamic pressure of bulk ice at an equal chemical potential and the interfacial stress with the interfacial free energy. Furthermore, we investigate these properties on the basal plane. We find that unlike in hard-sphere and Lennard-Jones systems, mechanical and thermodynamic pressures agree for the nucleus, and the interfacial stress and free energy are comparable. However, the basal interface displays an interfacial stress nearly twice its interfacial free energy, suggesting that this agreement may be dependent on the system, underscoring the limitations of mechanical routes to solid-liquid interfacial free energies.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry LettersVol. 17(8)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), University of Vienna (AT), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
81.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.