Exploring veterinarians’ perceptions of decision-making with clients in the context of providing access to veterinary care

Veterinarian-client decision-making and its role in improving accessibility of veterinary care for all pets is an emerging topic in the veterinary field. The objective of the present study was to understand veterinarians' perceptions and experiences engaging in decision-making with clients in the context of providing access to veterinary care. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with companion-animal veterinarians (n = 15), randomly sampled from across Ontario. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted on verbatim transcripts. Most participants worked strictly as a small-animal practitioner at a multi-vet practice, were women, and employed full-time. Four inductive themes relating to the primary study objective were identified: 1. discussing options helps address barriers to veterinary care, 2. veterinarians' descriptions of presenting options differed, 3. veterinarians and veterinary-team members face challenges in presenting options to clients, and 4. a recognized shift is happening away from a singular "Gold Standard" option. All participants discussed the importance of options and shared that discussing options assists in addressing access barriers to veterinary care. Participants differed in their descriptions of what presenting options to clients meant. Descriptions included A) presenting all available options alongside risks, benefits, and other details; B) making a recommendation and discussing other options, if needed; or C) contextualizing options based on history gathered prior to discussion of options with the client. Participant-identified challenges regarding discussion of options included time constraints, client non-cooperation, and veterinarian bias. All participants referenced the term "Gold Standard", with many acknowledging a shift away from this practice toward offering a range of options in support of providing access to veterinary care. Presenting options and working with clients to contextualize care offers a potential opportunity to increase access to veterinary care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0342564
Primary Topic
Veterinary Practice and Education Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring veterinarians’ perceptions of decision-making with clients in the context of providing access to veterinary care

C.A. Bauman, Jason B. Coe, Lauren E. Grant, Catherine N.H. Groves
PLoS ONE
Veterinary Practice and Education Studies
article

Exploring veterinarians’ perceptions of decision-making with clients in the context of providing access to veterinary care

C.A. Bauman, Jason B. Coe, Lauren E. Grant, Catherine N.H. Groves
article en

Abstract

Veterinarian-client decision-making and its role in improving accessibility of veterinary care for all pets is an emerging topic in the veterinary field. The objective of the present study was to understand veterinarians' perceptions and experiences engaging in decision-making with clients in the context of providing access to veterinary care. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with companion-animal veterinarians (n = 15), randomly sampled from across Ontario. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted on verbatim transcripts. Most participants worked strictly as a small-animal practitioner at a multi-vet practice, were women, and employed full-time. Four inductive themes relating to the primary study objective were identified: 1. discussing options helps address barriers to veterinary care, 2. veterinarians' descriptions of presenting options differed, 3. veterinarians and veterinary-team members face challenges in presenting options to clients, and 4. a recognized shift is happening away from a singular "Gold Standard" option. All participants discussed the importance of options and shared that discussing options assists in addressing access barriers to veterinary care. Participants differed in their descriptions of what presenting options to clients meant. Descriptions included A) presenting all available options alongside risks, benefits, and other details; B) making a recommendation and discussing other options, if needed; or C) contextualizing options based on history gathered prior to discussion of options with the client. Participant-identified challenges regarding discussion of options included time constraints, client non-cooperation, and veterinarian bias. All participants referenced the term "Gold Standard", with many acknowledging a shift away from this practice toward offering a range of options in support of providing access to veterinary care. Presenting options and working with clients to contextualize care offers a potential opportunity to increase access to veterinary care.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(2)
Ontario Veterinary College
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Veterinary Practice and Education Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.