Interfascial Injection Pressure Depending on Type of Regional Anesthesia Needle

<b>Introduction:</b> Reliable identification regarding interfascial spaces proves essential to achieve successful nerve block analgesia; however, ultrasound guided approaches are recognized as challenging, particularly in obese or pediatric patients. In prior cadaveric and clinical investigations, multiple approaches were evaluated to identify methods for measuring injection pressures as a function of needle position relative to fascia. Our previous study proposed simpler method of finding interfascial spaces with the needle tip. In this study, it was examined whether needle tip design influences injection pressures during regional anesthesia procedures, via an ex vivo pig specimen setup. <b>Methods:</b> A bespoke apparatus for tracking injection pressure was deployed to enable continuous measurement of intraluminal pressure generated while delivering saline throughout ultrasound guided peripheral nerve block needles conducted within pig thigh specimens. Delivery was performed using an infusion pump. Three types of needles of the same manufacturer (Pajunk) and same diameter (22G) but with different tips (Facet, Facet S and Sprotte) were used to measure injection pressures during penetration through tissues until interfascial plane hydrodissection was created. Statistical analyses were performed to compare pressure levels, variability, and temporal pressure trends. <b>Results:</b> Ninety ultrasound guided injections in porcine thigh tissue were analyzed, with thirty procedures per needle type. Injection pressure differed significantly between intramuscular, fascial puncture, and interfascial phases, showing a distinct puncture peak (<i>p</i> ≤ 3.44 × 10<sup>-14</sup>). Needle geometry significantly affected pressures across all phases (Kruskal-Wallis intramuscular <i>p</i> = 2.0 × 10<sup>-6</sup>, puncture <i>p</i> = 7.52 × 10<sup>-8</sup>, interfascial <i>p</i> = 9.2 × 10<sup>-5</sup>), with large pairwise effects (Hedges g up to 1.51). The classical tip produced the highest intramuscular and higher interfascial pressures, the sharp tip required the lowest puncture pressure, and the lateral tip yielded the lowest intramuscular and interfascial pressures. <b>Conclusions:</b> Needle tip geometry substantially influences pressure dynamics throughout the injection process, with the classical design associated with the highest fascia-penetration injection pressures and the sharp needle exhibiting the lowest, while the lateral design associated with lowest intramuscular-penetration and interfascial pressures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15041458
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interfascial Injection Pressure Depending on Type of Regional Anesthesia Needle

Jedrasiak Karol, Suwalska Aleksandra, Wodarski Piotr, Wilk Mateusz
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Interfascial Injection Pressure Depending on Type of Regional Anesthesia Needle

Jedrasiak Karol, Suwalska Aleksandra, Wodarski Piotr, Wilk Mateusz
article en

Abstract

<b>Introduction:</b> Reliable identification regarding interfascial spaces proves essential to achieve successful nerve block analgesia; however, ultrasound guided approaches are recognized as challenging, particularly in obese or pediatric patients. In prior cadaveric and clinical investigations, multiple approaches were evaluated to identify methods for measuring injection pressures as a function of needle position relative to fascia. Our previous study proposed simpler method of finding interfascial spaces with the needle tip. In this study, it was examined whether needle tip design influences injection pressures during regional anesthesia procedures, via an ex vivo pig specimen setup. <b>Methods:</b> A bespoke apparatus for tracking injection pressure was deployed to enable continuous measurement of intraluminal pressure generated while delivering saline throughout ultrasound guided peripheral nerve block needles conducted within pig thigh specimens. Delivery was performed using an infusion pump. Three types of needles of the same manufacturer (Pajunk) and same diameter (22G) but with different tips (Facet, Facet S and Sprotte) were used to measure injection pressures during penetration through tissues until interfascial plane hydrodissection was created. Statistical analyses were performed to compare pressure levels, variability, and temporal pressure trends. <b>Results:</b> Ninety ultrasound guided injections in porcine thigh tissue were analyzed, with thirty procedures per needle type. Injection pressure differed significantly between intramuscular, fascial puncture, and interfascial phases, showing a distinct puncture peak (<i>p</i> ≤ 3.44 × 10<sup>-14</sup>). Needle geometry significantly affected pressures across all phases (Kruskal-Wallis intramuscular <i>p</i> = 2.0 × 10<sup>-6</sup>, puncture <i>p</i> = 7.52 × 10<sup>-8</sup>, interfascial <i>p</i> = 9.2 × 10<sup>-5</sup>), with large pairwise effects (Hedges g up to 1.51). The classical tip produced the highest intramuscular and higher interfascial pressures, the sharp tip required the lowest puncture pressure, and the lateral tip yielded the lowest intramuscular and interfascial pressures. <b>Conclusions:</b> Needle tip geometry substantially influences pressure dynamics throughout the injection process, with the classical design associated with the highest fascia-penetration injection pressures and the sharp needle exhibiting the lowest, while the lateral design associated with lowest intramuscular-penetration and interfascial pressures.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(4)
Silesian University of Technology (PL), Medical University of Silesia (PL), WSB University (PL), University of Silesia in Katowice (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.