Paracetamol and NSAIDs in Cancer Pain Management: Evidence Review and Treatment Considerations

Pain is one of the most prevalent and distressing symptoms in cancer, affecting up to 90% of patients and significantly impairing quality of life. Paracetamol (acetaminophen) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely recommended by international guidelines for the management of non-surgical cancer pain, either alone or as adjuvants to opioids. In this paper, the current evidence for their efficacy, tolerability, and safety in this setting is reviewed. Evidence for paracetamol in cancer pain remains limited and of low quality. Small trials and systematic reviews suggest little or no additional analgesic benefit when used alongside strong opioids, and no clear advantage of intravenous over oral paracetamol has been demonstrated. Evidence for NSAIDs is slightly stronger, with studies indicating analgesic benefit both as monotherapy and in combination with opioids, although the quality of evidence is again restricted by small sample sizes, heterogeneity, and outdated trials. Concerns regarding adverse effects, particularly gastrointestinal, renal, and cardiovascular, often limit use, athough short-term use in patients receiving palliative care may be safer than historically perceived. Comparative data between individual NSAIDs, routes of administration, and longer-term use are lacking. Overall, while both paracetamol and NSAIDs are commonly prescribed and theoretically beneficial, high-quality, adequately powered studies in patients with cancer pain are scarce. Further research is needed to evidence their role, especially in opioid-sparing strategies, as well as determining the relative clinical effectiveness and harm of individual NSAIDs in patients with non-surgical cancer pain. Evidence for the efficacy of paracetamol in cancer pain is weak, with little benefit shown when added to strong opioids. NSAIDs may provide analgesic benefit alone or with opioids, but the supporting studies are small, dated, and heterogeneous. Adverse effects of NSAIDs (GI, renal, cardiovascular) remain important, though short-term use in palliative care may be acceptable with appropriate monitoring. Further high-quality trials are needed to clarify efficacy, opioid-sparing potential, and the role of individual NSAIDs in cancer pain management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Treatment Options in Oncology
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-025-01368-8
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Opioid Use
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Paracetamol and NSAIDs in Cancer Pain Management: Evidence Review and Treatment Considerations

J. Boland, Anna Bradley, Kate Hanwell
Current Treatment Options in Oncology
Pain Management and Opioid Use
article

Paracetamol and NSAIDs in Cancer Pain Management: Evidence Review and Treatment Considerations

J. Boland, Anna Bradley, Kate Hanwell
article en

Abstract

Pain is one of the most prevalent and distressing symptoms in cancer, affecting up to 90% of patients and significantly impairing quality of life. Paracetamol (acetaminophen) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely recommended by international guidelines for the management of non-surgical cancer pain, either alone or as adjuvants to opioids. In this paper, the current evidence for their efficacy, tolerability, and safety in this setting is reviewed. Evidence for paracetamol in cancer pain remains limited and of low quality. Small trials and systematic reviews suggest little or no additional analgesic benefit when used alongside strong opioids, and no clear advantage of intravenous over oral paracetamol has been demonstrated. Evidence for NSAIDs is slightly stronger, with studies indicating analgesic benefit both as monotherapy and in combination with opioids, although the quality of evidence is again restricted by small sample sizes, heterogeneity, and outdated trials. Concerns regarding adverse effects, particularly gastrointestinal, renal, and cardiovascular, often limit use, athough short-term use in patients receiving palliative care may be safer than historically perceived. Comparative data between individual NSAIDs, routes of administration, and longer-term use are lacking. Overall, while both paracetamol and NSAIDs are commonly prescribed and theoretically beneficial, high-quality, adequately powered studies in patients with cancer pain are scarce. Further research is needed to evidence their role, especially in opioid-sparing strategies, as well as determining the relative clinical effectiveness and harm of individual NSAIDs in patients with non-surgical cancer pain. Evidence for the efficacy of paracetamol in cancer pain is weak, with little benefit shown when added to strong opioids. NSAIDs may provide analgesic benefit alone or with opioids, but the supporting studies are small, dated, and heterogeneous. Adverse effects of NSAIDs (GI, renal, cardiovascular) remain important, though short-term use in palliative care may be acceptable with appropriate monitoring. Further high-quality trials are needed to clarify efficacy, opioid-sparing potential, and the role of individual NSAIDs in cancer pain management.

Current Treatment Options in OncologyVol. 27(1)
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB), West Middlesex University Hospital (GB), Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Hull York Medical School (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Pain Management and Opioid Use
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.