Determining sensory thresholds for juiciness and hardness in chicken breasts using chew-stage protocol and physicochemical validation

Juiciness and hardness are critical attributes of meat quality. In this study, we measured the juiciness and hardness of chicken breasts cooked using the vacuum low-temperature method, the pressure filter paper method, and a rheometer. To improve measurement efficiency and suitability for consumer panels, we employed a chew-stage sensory protocol that collected discrete ratings at three predefined stages (3 chews, 10 chews, and ready for swallowing). In addition, polarized sensory positioning (PSP) was introduced, using chicken breasts cooked at 100 °C for 3 hours as a fixed reference sample. This approach has helped to minimize the perceptual variation among panelists, and it also provided a consistent sensory anchor during evaluation. The results indicated that simultaneously achieving high juiciness and low hardness was challenging because hardness was predominantly influenced by temperature, whereas juiciness was primarily influenced by the cooking duration. Consequently, a perfect balance between juiciness and hardness cannot be achieved at a single temperature or cooking time, requiring tradeoffs based on specific cooking requirements. Sensory evaluation revealed a significant increase in juiciness with increased chewing time (<i>P</i> < 0.05), whereas hardness was not significantly affected. These sensory and physicochemical data suggest that controlling the cooking duration is more crucial than temperature for enhancing the juiciness of chicken breasts. A strong correlation was observed between the sensory ratings of juiciness and hardness and the corresponding physicochemical measurements (juiciness: <i>r</i> = 0.85, <i>P</i> < 0.001; hardness: <i>r</i> = 0.87, <i>P</i> < 0.001), thus confirming the validity of the sensory evaluation method used in this study. This study established a perceived juiciness threshold of 3.5% and a hardness threshold of 16.5 N. Based on the above findings, greater attention should be paid to optimizing the heating time during chicken breast cooking to achieve the desired meat quality and enhance cooking efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Science and Technology International
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10820132261419349
Primary Topic
Meat and Animal Product Quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determining sensory thresholds for juiciness and hardness in chicken breasts using chew-stage protocol and physicochemical validation

Shin-Ichi Ishikawa, Jiale Liang
Food Science and Technology International
Meat and Animal Product Quality
article

Determining sensory thresholds for juiciness and hardness in chicken breasts using chew-stage protocol and physicochemical validation

Shin-Ichi Ishikawa, Jiale Liang
article en

Abstract

Juiciness and hardness are critical attributes of meat quality. In this study, we measured the juiciness and hardness of chicken breasts cooked using the vacuum low-temperature method, the pressure filter paper method, and a rheometer. To improve measurement efficiency and suitability for consumer panels, we employed a chew-stage sensory protocol that collected discrete ratings at three predefined stages (3 chews, 10 chews, and ready for swallowing). In addition, polarized sensory positioning (PSP) was introduced, using chicken breasts cooked at 100 °C for 3 hours as a fixed reference sample. This approach has helped to minimize the perceptual variation among panelists, and it also provided a consistent sensory anchor during evaluation. The results indicated that simultaneously achieving high juiciness and low hardness was challenging because hardness was predominantly influenced by temperature, whereas juiciness was primarily influenced by the cooking duration. Consequently, a perfect balance between juiciness and hardness cannot be achieved at a single temperature or cooking time, requiring tradeoffs based on specific cooking requirements. Sensory evaluation revealed a significant increase in juiciness with increased chewing time (<i>P</i> < 0.05), whereas hardness was not significantly affected. These sensory and physicochemical data suggest that controlling the cooking duration is more crucial than temperature for enhancing the juiciness of chicken breasts. A strong correlation was observed between the sensory ratings of juiciness and hardness and the corresponding physicochemical measurements (juiciness: <i>r</i> = 0.85, <i>P</i> < 0.001; hardness: <i>r</i> = 0.87, <i>P</i> < 0.001), thus confirming the validity of the sensory evaluation method used in this study. This study established a perceived juiciness threshold of 3.5% and a hardness threshold of 16.5 N. Based on the above findings, greater attention should be paid to optimizing the heating time during chicken breast cooking to achieve the desired meat quality and enhance cooking efficiency.

Food Science and Technology International
Miyagi University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Meat and Animal Product Quality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Determining sensory thresholds for juiciness and hardness in chicken breasts using chew-stage protocol and physicochemical validation — Shin-Ichi Ishikawa, Jiale Liang · Food Science and Technology International (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS