Exploring the Governance–Disclosure Nexus: Board Structures and ESG Disclosures in South Africa

ABSTRACT This study examines how governance structures such as board composition and board functions influence environmental, social and governance (ESG) reporting among listed South African firms. This study examines 90 public listed companies on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange between 2012 and 2022. Over an 11‐year period, board size shows a significant positive relationship with ESG, Social (SOC) and Governance (GOV) disclosures, but not with environmental (ENV). Board independence and audit committee meeting frequency are positively and significantly linked to all four ESG disclosure models. Furthermore, audit committee size is positively associated with ENV and GOV disclosures but shows no effect on ESG or SOC. The findings emphasise the critical role of board structures in shaping strategic decisions, particularly regarding ESG disclosure. These insights may prove valuable to regulators, policymakers and investors seeking to make informed governance and investment decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Strategy and the Environment
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70615
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Governance–Disclosure Nexus: Board Structures and ESG Disclosures in South Africa

Suzanne Kieviet, Henriëtte Scholtz
Business Strategy and the Environment
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Exploring the Governance–Disclosure Nexus: Board Structures and ESG Disclosures in South Africa

Suzanne Kieviet, Henriëtte Scholtz
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines how governance structures such as board composition and board functions influence environmental, social and governance (ESG) reporting among listed South African firms. This study examines 90 public listed companies on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange between 2012 and 2022. Over an 11‐year period, board size shows a significant positive relationship with ESG, Social (SOC) and Governance (GOV) disclosures, but not with environmental (ENV). Board independence and audit committee meeting frequency are positively and significantly linked to all four ESG disclosure models. Furthermore, audit committee size is positively associated with ENV and GOV disclosures but shows no effect on ESG or SOC. The findings emphasise the critical role of board structures in shaping strategic decisions, particularly regarding ESG disclosure. These insights may prove valuable to regulators, policymakers and investors seeking to make informed governance and investment decisions.

Business Strategy and the Environment
Stellenbosch University (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.