Developing an Integrated Command-and-Control Training Environment for Fire and Rescue Services: From GIS and UAV Data to Virtual Reality Simulation

Effective command-and-control (C2) decision-making during emergency response relies on timely access to spatially accurate information. It also requires a clear understanding of evolving incident conditions. Traditional fire-service training methods provide limited opportunities to rehearse complex, high-risk, and large-scale incidents under realistic yet safe conditions. This exploratory pilot study presents the design and experimental evaluation of an integrated training environment that combines geographic information system (GIS) data, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery, and immersive virtual reality (VR) simulations to support C2 training for fire-service incident commanders. The system was assessed through scenario-based exercises involving 23 active incident commanders across three representative emergency scenarios: wildland fire, hazardous materials transport accident, and flood response. The training scenarios were based on real geographic areas in central Slovakia, using authentic terrain, land-cover, infrastructure, and hydrological GIS layers to ensure spatial realism of the simulated emergency environments. Pre-training and post-training questionnaires were used to evaluate perceived training realism, preparedness for command tasks, decision-making confidence, and the perceived usefulness of digital spatial information tools. Results indicate a substantial post-training increase in perceived realism and preparedness, with strong positive correlation between these variables (Spearman ρ = 0.71, p < 0.001). Participants reported improved confidence in assessing incident conditions, prioritizing operational tasks, and allocating resources under dynamically evolving scenarios. The study evaluates perceived spatial situational understanding derived from multi-source spatial information integration rather than directly measured situational awareness using standardized psychometric instruments. UAV imagery was found to be particularly valuable for rapid incident size-up, while GIS layers primarily supported spatial planning, hazard delineation, and resource coordination; VR served as a unifying platform for fusing these information sources into a coherent operational picture. Scenario-specific differences in tool usefulness were observed, reflecting the spatial and risk characteristics of each incident type. Overall, the findings indicate that integrated GIS–UAV–VR environments provide a realistic and scalable complement to traditional fire-service command training, enhancing spatially supported decision-making and preparedness for complex emergency response. Given the single-group pretest–posttest design, limited sample size, absence of a control group, and reliance on perceived evaluation measures, the results should be interpreted as indicative rather than as generalizable evidence of training effectiveness.