A Quantitative Geological-Strength-Index-Based Method for Estimating Direct Rock Mass Parameters from 3D Point Clouds

The Geological Strength Index (GSI) is a crucial tool for assessing jointed rock masses, but it is often hindered by subjectivity in visual assessments. In this study, we propose a novel quantitative GSI method wherein 3D laser-scanning point clouds are used to quantitatively derive empirical rock mass indices (SR and SCR) to estimate mechanical parameters. By integrating the GSI with the Rock Block Index (RBI) and joint spacing, a framework for quantifying the Structural Rating (SR) is established. Furthermore, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is employed to assign weights to Surface Condition Rating (SCR) factors. The results indicate that infilling materials have the most significant impact on SCR (weight 0.6334), followed by weathering (0.2605) and roughness (0.1061). This method was applied to evaluate rock masses at depths of −915 to −960 m in the Sanshandao Gold Mine. The GSI values calculated for the foot wall, ore body, and hanging wall were 38.5, 33.8, and 37.8, respectively. Validation against conventional quantitative methods demonstrated high accuracy, with a maximum relative GSI difference of 1.5 and a deformation modulus difference of only 0.227 GPa. This data-driven approach effectively reduces subjectivity and provides a reliable tool for automated geotechnical parameter estimation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Processes
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14040641
Primary Topic
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Quantitative Geological-Strength-Index-Based Method for Estimating Direct Rock Mass Parameters from 3D Point Clouds

Huaibin Li, Xingdong Zhao, Yangyang Li, Lei Deng
Processes
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
article

A Quantitative Geological-Strength-Index-Based Method for Estimating Direct Rock Mass Parameters from 3D Point Clouds

Huaibin Li, Xingdong Zhao, Yangyang Li, Lei Deng
article en

Abstract

The Geological Strength Index (GSI) is a crucial tool for assessing jointed rock masses, but it is often hindered by subjectivity in visual assessments. In this study, we propose a novel quantitative GSI method wherein 3D laser-scanning point clouds are used to quantitatively derive empirical rock mass indices (SR and SCR) to estimate mechanical parameters. By integrating the GSI with the Rock Block Index (RBI) and joint spacing, a framework for quantifying the Structural Rating (SR) is established. Furthermore, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is employed to assign weights to Surface Condition Rating (SCR) factors. The results indicate that infilling materials have the most significant impact on SCR (weight 0.6334), followed by weathering (0.2605) and roughness (0.1061). This method was applied to evaluate rock masses at depths of −915 to −960 m in the Sanshandao Gold Mine. The GSI values calculated for the foot wall, ore body, and hanging wall were 38.5, 33.8, and 37.8, respectively. Validation against conventional quantitative methods demonstrated high accuracy, with a maximum relative GSI difference of 1.5 and a deformation modulus difference of only 0.227 GPa. This data-driven approach effectively reduces subjectivity and provides a reliable tool for automated geotechnical parameter estimation.

ProcessesVol. 14(4)
Anhui University of Science and Technology (CN), Jining University (CN), Northeastern University (CN), University of Science and Technology Beijing (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.