Towards a decolonial AI sovereignty model for indigenous educational settings

This article proposes a critical reorientation of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in Indigenous educational settings. We argue that GenAI, built on Western epistemologies, reproduces colonial hierarchies and risks what de Sousa Santos calls epistemicide. To confront these harms, we introduce the Decolonial AI Sovereignty (DAIS) model – a conceptual framework grounded in Indigenous data sovereignty, relational ethics, and decolonial refusal. To operationalise DAIS, we draw on seven illustrative case studies of Indigenous-led or Indigenous-engaged AI initiatives. Together, these cases demonstrate how Indigenous communities can actively shape technological futures that challenge extractive models and assert sovereign control over knowledge. We argue that Indigenous governance of GenAI must extend beyond data inclusion to encompass full epistemic jurisdiction, including the right to withhold participation in extractive digital systems. Unlike posthuman or critical pedagogical frameworks that emphasise AI as a co-creator, DAIS is unique in grounding AI’s role within Indigenous sovereignty, refusal, and ceremonial protocols, placing political and colonial conditions at the foundation rather than the margins. By bridging critical Indigenous theory, AI ethics, and educational futures, this article contributes to an emerging discourse on Indigenous AI sovereignty and offers a roadmap for reclaiming generative technologies as tools of resurgence, not assimilation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Education
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2026.2626631
Primary Topic
Digital Education and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards a decolonial AI sovereignty model for indigenous educational settings

Marcellus Forh Mbah, Leigh Jarvis
Cogent Education
Digital Education and Society
article

Towards a decolonial AI sovereignty model for indigenous educational settings

Marcellus Forh Mbah, Leigh Jarvis
article en

Abstract

This article proposes a critical reorientation of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in Indigenous educational settings. We argue that GenAI, built on Western epistemologies, reproduces colonial hierarchies and risks what de Sousa Santos calls epistemicide. To confront these harms, we introduce the Decolonial AI Sovereignty (DAIS) model – a conceptual framework grounded in Indigenous data sovereignty, relational ethics, and decolonial refusal. To operationalise DAIS, we draw on seven illustrative case studies of Indigenous-led or Indigenous-engaged AI initiatives. Together, these cases demonstrate how Indigenous communities can actively shape technological futures that challenge extractive models and assert sovereign control over knowledge. We argue that Indigenous governance of GenAI must extend beyond data inclusion to encompass full epistemic jurisdiction, including the right to withhold participation in extractive digital systems. Unlike posthuman or critical pedagogical frameworks that emphasise AI as a co-creator, DAIS is unique in grounding AI’s role within Indigenous sovereignty, refusal, and ceremonial protocols, placing political and colonial conditions at the foundation rather than the margins. By bridging critical Indigenous theory, AI ethics, and educational futures, this article contributes to an emerging discourse on Indigenous AI sovereignty and offers a roadmap for reclaiming generative technologies as tools of resurgence, not assimilation.

Cogent EducationVol. 13(1)
University of Manchester (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Digital Education and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Towards a decolonial AI sovereignty model for indigenous educational settings — Marcellus Forh Mbah, Leigh Jarvis · Cogent Education (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS