Better together: a critical survey of conceptions of religious literacy and analysis of the implications for application to healthcare in the USA

Healthcare and religion are deeply intertwined facets of human experience. Each has existed as long as the other, and influences between them are accordingly protean. This is true globally and especially in the USA, one of the most religiously diverse industrialised nations but, ironically, also one plagued by a paucity of religious literacy (RL). This paper will argue that US healthcare settings are particularly treacherous areas regarding the lack of RL. Although recent decades have witnessed increased awareness of the importance of religion/spirituality (R/S) for patients, the ability of healthcare providers to incorporate R/S in the care of their patients is lacking, due largely to a lack of RL. This paper will examine how work in this area has been limited by a lack of agreement on how to define RL, by several barriers to the religiously literate provision of spiritual care, and by the lack of a quantitative instrument with which to measure RL. Reviewing four prominent notions of RL-based on (1) Knowledge, (2) Understanding, (3) Faith and (4) Practice-this paper will further argue that one of these (understanding) is most amenable to application to healthcare but is informed in important ways by the other three, which function better together with the one.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Humanities
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2025-013480
Primary Topic
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Better together: a critical survey of conceptions of religious literacy and analysis of the implications for application to healthcare in the USA

Steven C. Cunningham
Medical Humanities
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
article

Better together: a critical survey of conceptions of religious literacy and analysis of the implications for application to healthcare in the USA

Steven C. Cunningham
article en

Abstract

Healthcare and religion are deeply intertwined facets of human experience. Each has existed as long as the other, and influences between them are accordingly protean. This is true globally and especially in the USA, one of the most religiously diverse industrialised nations but, ironically, also one plagued by a paucity of religious literacy (RL). This paper will argue that US healthcare settings are particularly treacherous areas regarding the lack of RL. Although recent decades have witnessed increased awareness of the importance of religion/spirituality (R/S) for patients, the ability of healthcare providers to incorporate R/S in the care of their patients is lacking, due largely to a lack of RL. This paper will examine how work in this area has been limited by a lack of agreement on how to define RL, by several barriers to the religiously literate provision of spiritual care, and by the lack of a quantitative instrument with which to measure RL. Reviewing four prominent notions of RL-based on (1) Knowledge, (2) Understanding, (3) Faith and (4) Practice-this paper will further argue that one of these (understanding) is most amenable to application to healthcare but is informed in important ways by the other three, which function better together with the one.

Medical Humanities
Ascension (US), Harvard University Press (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.