“Thoughts and Prayers”: The (Non) Effect of Partisan Responses to Mass Shootings on Public Opinion

Experts consider gun violence a public health crisis in the United States. Its increasing magnitude has pressured some Republican lawmakers to reconsider their responses to these events, moving away from sending condolences of "thoughts and prayers" to the victims and moving towards alternative, policy-oriented rhetoric. Ample literature in political science finds that how politicians speak about issues can shape voters' viewpoints on them. Could a Republican move away from "thoughts and prayers" rhetoric soften the cleavage on second amendment rights and lead to gun reform? Findings from a recent survey experiment suggest otherwise. Different rhetoric by Republican politicians did not move public opinion on firearm reform. There continues to be, however, substantial baseline support for several policies that would likely reduce gun violence. We comment on the implications of these findings on the politics of firearm policy reform in America.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-1231807
Primary Topic
Gun Ownership and Violence Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Thoughts and Prayers”: The (Non) Effect of Partisan Responses to Mass Shootings on Public Opinion

Isabel M. Perera, C. E. III BARRY, Anil Menon
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law
Gun Ownership and Violence Research
article

“Thoughts and Prayers”: The (Non) Effect of Partisan Responses to Mass Shootings on Public Opinion

Isabel M. Perera, C. E. III BARRY, Anil Menon
article en

Abstract

Experts consider gun violence a public health crisis in the United States. Its increasing magnitude has pressured some Republican lawmakers to reconsider their responses to these events, moving away from sending condolences of "thoughts and prayers" to the victims and moving towards alternative, policy-oriented rhetoric. Ample literature in political science finds that how politicians speak about issues can shape voters' viewpoints on them. Could a Republican move away from "thoughts and prayers" rhetoric soften the cleavage on second amendment rights and lead to gun reform? Findings from a recent survey experiment suggest otherwise. Different rhetoric by Republican politicians did not move public opinion on firearm reform. There continues to be, however, substantial baseline support for several policies that would likely reduce gun violence. We comment on the implications of these findings on the politics of firearm policy reform in America.

Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law
University of California, Merced (US), Cornell University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Gun Ownership and Violence Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.