Isolation, Identification, and Validation of Strains from Commercial Probiotics: Do We Get What We Expect?

This study evaluated the viability, microbiological composition, functional traits, and safety of probiotic bacteria isolated from commercial products marketed as containing <i>Limosilactobacillus reuteri</i>. Viable cell counts, biochemical characterization, strain-level identification, functional properties, gastrointestinal tolerance, and safety attributes were assessed. Among the evaluated products, only four presented colony-forming units (CFU) counts consistent with label claims (products E, F, G, and H), while two showed no detectable viable microorganisms (products B and L). All isolates were Gram-positive, catalase-negative, and predominantly rod-shaped. rep-PCR analysis revealed strain homogeneity in most products, whereas others (products A and K) exhibited heterogeneous microbial compositions. Molecular identification based on 16S rRNA sequencing showed a predominance of <i>Lmb. reuteri</i> and <i>Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus</i>, with some products containing additional species such as <i>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</i> and <i>Lactobacillus acidophilus</i>. Functional assays demonstrated strain-dependent proteolytic and diacetyl-producing capacities, as well as variable tolerance to simulated gastrointestinal conditions. Most strains preferentially produced L-lactate, although some generated substantial amounts of D-lactate. All isolates were susceptible to antibiotics recommended by EFSA, except for intrinsic vancomycin resistance, and no transferable virulence markers, biogenic amine production, or <i>Salmonella</i> contamination were detected. Furthermore, virulence-related genes such as <i>hdc</i>, <i>tdc</i>, <i>odc</i>, <i>hyl</i>, <i>cylA</i>, and <i>ace</i> were not identified. Overall, the results highlight pronounced discrepancies between label claims and microbiological quality among commercial probiotic products and reinforce the importance of strain-level characterization to ensure safety, functional performance, and regulatory compliance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foods
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15040674
Primary Topic
Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Isolation, Identification, and Validation of Strains from Commercial Probiotics: Do We Get What We Expect?

Emília Maria França Lima, Svetoslav Dimitrov Todorov, Katia Leani, Isabella Somera de Oliveira e Silva
Foods
Probiotics and Fermented Foods
article

Isolation, Identification, and Validation of Strains from Commercial Probiotics: Do We Get What We Expect?

Emília Maria França Lima, Svetoslav Dimitrov Todorov, Katia Leani, Isabella Somera de Oliveira e Silva
article en

Abstract

This study evaluated the viability, microbiological composition, functional traits, and safety of probiotic bacteria isolated from commercial products marketed as containing <i>Limosilactobacillus reuteri</i>. Viable cell counts, biochemical characterization, strain-level identification, functional properties, gastrointestinal tolerance, and safety attributes were assessed. Among the evaluated products, only four presented colony-forming units (CFU) counts consistent with label claims (products E, F, G, and H), while two showed no detectable viable microorganisms (products B and L). All isolates were Gram-positive, catalase-negative, and predominantly rod-shaped. rep-PCR analysis revealed strain homogeneity in most products, whereas others (products A and K) exhibited heterogeneous microbial compositions. Molecular identification based on 16S rRNA sequencing showed a predominance of <i>Lmb. reuteri</i> and <i>Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus</i>, with some products containing additional species such as <i>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</i> and <i>Lactobacillus acidophilus</i>. Functional assays demonstrated strain-dependent proteolytic and diacetyl-producing capacities, as well as variable tolerance to simulated gastrointestinal conditions. Most strains preferentially produced L-lactate, although some generated substantial amounts of D-lactate. All isolates were susceptible to antibiotics recommended by EFSA, except for intrinsic vancomycin resistance, and no transferable virulence markers, biogenic amine production, or <i>Salmonella</i> contamination were detected. Furthermore, virulence-related genes such as <i>hdc</i>, <i>tdc</i>, <i>odc</i>, <i>hyl</i>, <i>cylA</i>, and <i>ace</i> were not identified. Overall, the results highlight pronounced discrepancies between label claims and microbiological quality among commercial probiotic products and reinforce the importance of strain-level characterization to ensure safety, functional performance, and regulatory compliance.

FoodsVol. 15(4)
Sechenov University (RU), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade Politécnica de Viana do Castelo (PT), Faculdades Oswaldo Cruz (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Probiotics and Fermented Foods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.