Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Evaluating Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review of Prospective Observational Studies

Artificial intelligence (AI) embedded in point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) could reduce operator dependence in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessment and accelerate bedside decision making by non-cardiologists and non-radiologists. Prospective comparative studies evaluating real-time AI-assisted POCUS for LVEF across point-of-care settings were systematically reviewed. The PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to June 11, 2025. The authors included prospective analytical observational studies in intensive care unit (ICU), emergency department, perioperative, ward, or home settings that used AI during image acquisition and/or interpretation to estimate LVEF in real time against a reference standard. Risk of bias was appraised using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Because of heterogeneity, the findings were narratively synthesized. Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria across ICU, emergency department, perioperative, ward, and community settings. For continuous outcomes, agreement (r) between AI-derived and reference LVEF ranged from 0.56 to 0.92 and intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.84 to 0.94. Bland-Altman analyses demonstrated broad limits of agreement, from approximately -31.8% to +20.0%, often indicating a tendency for AI to underestimate LVEF compared with reference measures. For categorical classification at a 50% threshold, sensitivities ranged from 70% to 93%; specificities, from 89% to 100%; and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves, from 0.85 to 0.98. Weighted κ values ranged from 0.49 to 0.83. No study achieved a low risk of bias across all QUADAS-2 domains. AI-assisted POCUS can approximate reference LVEF and reasonably classify reduced LVEF at the bedside, supporting its use as a screening and triage tool in settings in which comprehensive echocardiography is not immediately available. Future studies should adopt intention-to-diagnose designs, standardize the Simpson biplane reference, minimize test delay, report calibration and failure rates, and incorporate image quality feedback.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2026.02.011
Primary Topic
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Evaluating Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review of Prospective Observational Studies

Thomas M. Hemmerling, Louis Morisson, Pascal Laferrière-Langlois, Tudor Pintilei et al.
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
article

Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Evaluating Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review of Prospective Observational Studies

Thomas M. Hemmerling, Louis Morisson, Pascal Laferrière-Langlois, Tudor Pintilei, Joe Zako, André Denault, Julien Burey, Shi Shu Wang
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) embedded in point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) could reduce operator dependence in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessment and accelerate bedside decision making by non-cardiologists and non-radiologists. Prospective comparative studies evaluating real-time AI-assisted POCUS for LVEF across point-of-care settings were systematically reviewed. The PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to June 11, 2025. The authors included prospective analytical observational studies in intensive care unit (ICU), emergency department, perioperative, ward, or home settings that used AI during image acquisition and/or interpretation to estimate LVEF in real time against a reference standard. Risk of bias was appraised using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Because of heterogeneity, the findings were narratively synthesized. Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria across ICU, emergency department, perioperative, ward, and community settings. For continuous outcomes, agreement (r) between AI-derived and reference LVEF ranged from 0.56 to 0.92 and intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.84 to 0.94. Bland-Altman analyses demonstrated broad limits of agreement, from approximately -31.8% to +20.0%, often indicating a tendency for AI to underestimate LVEF compared with reference measures. For categorical classification at a 50% threshold, sensitivities ranged from 70% to 93%; specificities, from 89% to 100%; and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves, from 0.85 to 0.98. Weighted κ values ranged from 0.49 to 0.83. No study achieved a low risk of bias across all QUADAS-2 domains. AI-assisted POCUS can approximate reference LVEF and reasonably classify reduced LVEF at the bedside, supporting its use as a screening and triage tool in settings in which comprehensive echocardiography is not immediately available. Future studies should adopt intention-to-diagnose designs, standardize the Simpson biplane reference, minimize test delay, report calibration and failure rates, and incorporate image quality feedback.

Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Montreal Heart Institute (CA), McGill University Health Centre (CA), Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont (CA), Sorbonne Université (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Hôpital Tenon (FR), McGill University (CA), Université de Montréal (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.