Femoral Nerve Block Versus Pericapsular Nerve Group Block for Pain Management in Emergency Department Patients with Extracapsular Hip Fractures

<b>Background and Objectives:</b> Regional anesthesia is one of the critical alternatives for managing severe pain in patients with hip fractures. Femoral nerve block (FNB) is a common technique, and pericapsular nerve group block (PENG) has emerged as a promising alternative. However, the comparative efficacy of these techniques in extracapsular hip fractures, which have a distinct innervation pattern from intracapsular fractures, is not well established. Thus, we compared the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided FNB and PENG blocks in emergency department (ED) patients with extracapsular hip fractures. <b>Methods:</b> This single-center, retrospective observational study was conducted from 1 January 2020 to 31 July 2021. We included adult patients presenting to the ED with an acute, isolated extracapsular hip fracture who received FNB or PENG. The primary outcome was pain reduction, analyzed by pain trajectory analysis according to the pain intensity difference (PID) at multiple time points (0, 15, 30, 60, and 120 min) and a time-to-event analysis for meaningful pain relief (PID ≥ 4). Secondary outcomes included rescue morphine consumption, ED length of stay (LOS), and hospital LOS. <b>Results:</b> Thirty-nine patients were included (21 FNB; 18 PENG). The FNB group demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in pain scores over time than the PENG group (likelihood ratio test <i>p</i> < 0.001). In the time-to-event analysis, median time to meaningful pain relief was 1 min in the FNB group versus 114 min in the PENG group. Cox proportional hazards modeling demonstrated that the FNB group achieved meaningful pain relief 2.40 times faster than the PENG group (HR = 2.40, 95% CI = 1.06-5.44, <i>p</i> = 0.03). There were no significant differences between the groups in rescue morphine use, ED LOS, or hospital LOS after multivariable adjustment. <b>Conclusions:</b> In this retrospective observational study of patients with extracapsular hip fractures, FNB was associated with more rapid and effective pain relief than PENG. These findings suggest that FNB may be considered a favorable regional analgesic technique for these patients, though prospective randomized trials are needed to establish definitive treatment recommendations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15041454
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Femoral Nerve Block Versus Pericapsular Nerve Group Block for Pain Management in Emergency Department Patients with Extracapsular Hip Fractures

Kar Mun Cheong, Su Weng Chau, Tou-Yuan Tsai, Hua Li et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Femoral Nerve Block Versus Pericapsular Nerve Group Block for Pain Management in Emergency Department Patients with Extracapsular Hip Fractures

Kar Mun Cheong, Su Weng Chau, Tou-Yuan Tsai, Hua Li, Yi-Kung Lee, Cheng-Han Chiang
article en

Abstract

<b>Background and Objectives:</b> Regional anesthesia is one of the critical alternatives for managing severe pain in patients with hip fractures. Femoral nerve block (FNB) is a common technique, and pericapsular nerve group block (PENG) has emerged as a promising alternative. However, the comparative efficacy of these techniques in extracapsular hip fractures, which have a distinct innervation pattern from intracapsular fractures, is not well established. Thus, we compared the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided FNB and PENG blocks in emergency department (ED) patients with extracapsular hip fractures. <b>Methods:</b> This single-center, retrospective observational study was conducted from 1 January 2020 to 31 July 2021. We included adult patients presenting to the ED with an acute, isolated extracapsular hip fracture who received FNB or PENG. The primary outcome was pain reduction, analyzed by pain trajectory analysis according to the pain intensity difference (PID) at multiple time points (0, 15, 30, 60, and 120 min) and a time-to-event analysis for meaningful pain relief (PID ≥ 4). Secondary outcomes included rescue morphine consumption, ED length of stay (LOS), and hospital LOS. <b>Results:</b> Thirty-nine patients were included (21 FNB; 18 PENG). The FNB group demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in pain scores over time than the PENG group (likelihood ratio test <i>p</i> < 0.001). In the time-to-event analysis, median time to meaningful pain relief was 1 min in the FNB group versus 114 min in the PENG group. Cox proportional hazards modeling demonstrated that the FNB group achieved meaningful pain relief 2.40 times faster than the PENG group (HR = 2.40, 95% CI = 1.06-5.44, <i>p</i> = 0.03). There were no significant differences between the groups in rescue morphine use, ED LOS, or hospital LOS after multivariable adjustment. <b>Conclusions:</b> In this retrospective observational study of patients with extracapsular hip fractures, FNB was associated with more rapid and effective pain relief than PENG. These findings suggest that FNB may be considered a favorable regional analgesic technique for these patients, though prospective randomized trials are needed to establish definitive treatment recommendations.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(4)
National Taiwan University (TW), Tzu Chi University (TW), Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.