Physiological and perceptual effects of two passive back-support exoskeletons during repetitive lifting in healthy adults

Passive back-support exoskeletons (PBEs) are wearable devices designed to reduce strain during physical labor, e.g., repetitive lifting. This study investigated acute effects of two PBEs on cardiac load, energy expenditure, neuromuscular activity, and perceived exertion during repetitive lifting. Twenty-six healthy adults performed a standardized lifting task under three conditions: without exoskeleton (FREE), with a rigid PBE (RIGID), and with a soft PBE (SOFT). Cardiac load was assessed via impedance cardiography and blood pressure; energy expenditure via respiratory gas analysis; and neuromuscular activity via surface electromyography. Subjective ratings of exertion and comfort were collected before, during, and after the task. Data were analyzed using repeated measures analyses of variances and mixed-effects models, all followed by post-hoc tests. Both exoskeletons reduced rate-pressure product (RIGID: −8.1%, p = 0.001; SOFT: −6.5%, p = 0.003), energy expenditure (RIGID: −13.9%, p < 0.0001; SOFT: −9.4%, p < 0.0001), and perceived exertion (RIGID: −14.4%, p < 0.001; SOFT: −9.5%, p = 0.034) compared to FREE. Only RIGID reduced gluteus maximus muscle activation (− 21%, p = 0.005). No significant changes were observed in trunk or abdominal muscles. Wearing comfort declined post-task for both devices. No differences occurred between PBEs across all parameters. This study demonstrates that rigid and soft PBEs consistently reduce physiological and perceptual demands during lifting. By integrating central and peripheral hemodynamic measures, we extend understanding of cardiac unloading. Long-term field studies are needed to assess whether these benefits persist in real-world settings and contribute to musculoskeletal and cardiovascular health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-026-06125-9
Primary Topic
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physiological and perceptual effects of two passive back-support exoskeletons during repetitive lifting in healthy adults

Christoph Pökel, ULRICH LAUFS, Maxi Kramer, Olaf Ueberschär et al.
European Journal of Applied Physiology
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
article

Physiological and perceptual effects of two passive back-support exoskeletons during repetitive lifting in healthy adults

Christoph Pökel, ULRICH LAUFS, Maxi Kramer, Olaf Ueberschär, Roberto Falz, Johannes Voß, Max Schuhte, Jonas Deicke, Celina Schlosser
article en

Abstract

Passive back-support exoskeletons (PBEs) are wearable devices designed to reduce strain during physical labor, e.g., repetitive lifting. This study investigated acute effects of two PBEs on cardiac load, energy expenditure, neuromuscular activity, and perceived exertion during repetitive lifting. Twenty-six healthy adults performed a standardized lifting task under three conditions: without exoskeleton (FREE), with a rigid PBE (RIGID), and with a soft PBE (SOFT). Cardiac load was assessed via impedance cardiography and blood pressure; energy expenditure via respiratory gas analysis; and neuromuscular activity via surface electromyography. Subjective ratings of exertion and comfort were collected before, during, and after the task. Data were analyzed using repeated measures analyses of variances and mixed-effects models, all followed by post-hoc tests. Both exoskeletons reduced rate-pressure product (RIGID: −8.1%, p = 0.001; SOFT: −6.5%, p = 0.003), energy expenditure (RIGID: −13.9%, p < 0.0001; SOFT: −9.4%, p < 0.0001), and perceived exertion (RIGID: −14.4%, p < 0.001; SOFT: −9.5%, p = 0.034) compared to FREE. Only RIGID reduced gluteus maximus muscle activation (− 21%, p = 0.005). No significant changes were observed in trunk or abdominal muscles. Wearing comfort declined post-task for both devices. No differences occurred between PBEs across all parameters. This study demonstrates that rigid and soft PBEs consistently reduce physiological and perceptual demands during lifting. By integrating central and peripheral hemodynamic measures, we extend understanding of cardiac unloading. Long-term field studies are needed to assess whether these benefits persist in real-world settings and contribute to musculoskeletal and cardiovascular health.

European Journal of Applied Physiology
Rosa Luxemburg Foundation (DE), Institut für Angewandte Trainingswissenschaft (DE), University Hospital Leipzig (DE), Hochschule Magdeburg-Stendal (DE), Leipzig University (DE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.