Mandatory ESG Disclosure and Corporate Performance: Evidence From the EU CSRD

ABSTRACT This study examines the early effects of the European Union's Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) on firms' sustainability performance and financial outcomes using panel data for EU‐listed companies from 2017 to 2023. Drawing on Stakeholder Theory and Legitimacy Theory, the analysis assesses whether mandatory Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) disclosure enhances transparency, strengthens organisational legitimacy and improves corporate financial performance. Using a Difference‐in‐Differences framework that compares firms covered by the CSRD with those outside the mandate, the results show that mandatory disclosure is associated with significant improvements in ESG performance and modest gains in profitability and market valuation. However, these benefits are notably weaker for financially constrained firms, suggesting that limited investment capacity reduces their ability to convert regulatory pressure into substantive sustainability improvements. Overall, the findings indicate that while the CSRD reduces information asymmetry and promotes more credible ESG practices, its financial effects are uneven and depend on firms' underlying financial flexibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70471
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mandatory ESG Disclosure and Corporate Performance: Evidence From the EU CSRD

Mohammad Talha
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Mandatory ESG Disclosure and Corporate Performance: Evidence From the EU CSRD

Mohammad Talha
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines the early effects of the European Union's Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) on firms' sustainability performance and financial outcomes using panel data for EU‐listed companies from 2017 to 2023. Drawing on Stakeholder Theory and Legitimacy Theory, the analysis assesses whether mandatory Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) disclosure enhances transparency, strengthens organisational legitimacy and improves corporate financial performance. Using a Difference‐in‐Differences framework that compares firms covered by the CSRD with those outside the mandate, the results show that mandatory disclosure is associated with significant improvements in ESG performance and modest gains in profitability and market valuation. However, these benefits are notably weaker for financially constrained firms, suggesting that limited investment capacity reduces their ability to convert regulatory pressure into substantive sustainability improvements. Overall, the findings indicate that while the CSRD reduces information asymmetry and promotes more credible ESG practices, its financial effects are uneven and depend on firms' underlying financial flexibility.

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Prince Mohammad bin Fahd University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.