Surgical outcomes of endoscopic endonasal surgery for nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma in elderly patients: a comprehensive analysis beyond age

Due to the rapid aging of the global population, it is challenging to identify elderly individuals who are optimal candidates for the surgical treatment of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors. While chronological age has traditionally influenced surgical decision-making, the independent effect of age on outcomes requires a comprehensive evaluation that controls for comorbidities and tumor characteristics. This retrospective analysis included 305 patients (≥18 years) who underwent endoscopic endonasal surgery for clinically nonfunctioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumors between March 2020 and February 2024 at a single tertiary center. Patients were stratified by age (<65 vs. ≥65 years) and evaluated using propensity score matching. The outcomes included gross total resection rates, complications, endocrinological recovery, and visual outcomes. Composite outcome measures were developed to assess multifaceted surgical success. Maximally selected rank statistics identified optimal age cutoffs for hormone recovery. The cohort included 305 patients. Elderly patients (≥65 years, n=105) presented with significantly greater comorbidity burdens, including hypertension and diabetes. Following propensity score matching (n=105 per group), no significant age-based differences were observed in terms of gross total resection rates (84.8% vs. 84.8%) or major complications. Age 57 was found to be the optimal cutoff for endocrinological recovery (60.7% vs. 33.1%, p<0.001), with the gonadotroph axis being the most significantly affected hormone axis. The visual outcomes demonstrated remarkable age independence, as recovery was mainly dependent on gross total resection and preoperative visual field severity. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that higher body mass index (BMI), specific cardiovascular comorbidities, and intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks, rather than chronological age, served as independent predictors of adverse outcomes, including surgical site infections and prolonged hospital stays. Chronological age alone should not constitute an absolute contraindication to endoscopic pituitary surgery. These findings underscore that comprehensive preoperative evaluations should prioritize functional status and modifiable risk factors, including cardiovascular comorbidities and BMI, to optimize outcomes for patients of all ages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Endocrine Disorders
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-026-02173-6
Primary Topic
Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Surgical outcomes of endoscopic endonasal surgery for nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma in elderly patients: a comprehensive analysis beyond age

Seung Shin Park, J. Kim, C. Park, Hye Seok Park et al.
BMC Endocrine Disorders
Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
article

Surgical outcomes of endoscopic endonasal surgery for nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma in elderly patients: a comprehensive analysis beyond age

Seung Shin Park, J. Kim, C. Park, Hye Seok Park, Sun Mo Nam, Yong Hwy Kim, Min-Sung Kim, Hee-Pyoung Park, Jong Ha Hwang
article en

Abstract

Due to the rapid aging of the global population, it is challenging to identify elderly individuals who are optimal candidates for the surgical treatment of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors. While chronological age has traditionally influenced surgical decision-making, the independent effect of age on outcomes requires a comprehensive evaluation that controls for comorbidities and tumor characteristics. This retrospective analysis included 305 patients (≥18 years) who underwent endoscopic endonasal surgery for clinically nonfunctioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumors between March 2020 and February 2024 at a single tertiary center. Patients were stratified by age (<65 vs. ≥65 years) and evaluated using propensity score matching. The outcomes included gross total resection rates, complications, endocrinological recovery, and visual outcomes. Composite outcome measures were developed to assess multifaceted surgical success. Maximally selected rank statistics identified optimal age cutoffs for hormone recovery. The cohort included 305 patients. Elderly patients (≥65 years, n=105) presented with significantly greater comorbidity burdens, including hypertension and diabetes. Following propensity score matching (n=105 per group), no significant age-based differences were observed in terms of gross total resection rates (84.8% vs. 84.8%) or major complications. Age 57 was found to be the optimal cutoff for endocrinological recovery (60.7% vs. 33.1%, p<0.001), with the gonadotroph axis being the most significantly affected hormone axis. The visual outcomes demonstrated remarkable age independence, as recovery was mainly dependent on gross total resection and preoperative visual field severity. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that higher body mass index (BMI), specific cardiovascular comorbidities, and intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks, rather than chronological age, served as independent predictors of adverse outcomes, including surgical site infections and prolonged hospital stays. Chronological age alone should not constitute an absolute contraindication to endoscopic pituitary surgery. These findings underscore that comprehensive preoperative evaluations should prioritize functional status and modifiable risk factors, including cardiovascular comorbidities and BMI, to optimize outcomes for patients of all ages.

BMC Endocrine DisordersVol. 26(1)
New Generation University College (ET), Seoul National University Hospital (KR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.