This article explains the secrecy paradox, but don’t tell anyone!

The present study examined how the secrecy paradox-signalling privileged knowledge while at the same time concealing its content to preserve exclusivity-affected communication in an online community. Data were a comprehensive discussion thread about the existence and location of a large secret underground command centre (a "Riksbunker") that would serve as the Swedish governments Cold War contingency plan for a potential World War III. The study used a mixed-method design combining critical discourse analysis (CDA) with citation network and community cluster analysis. Network analysis revealed a modular structure of tightly connected clusters with a small number of core users controlling the information flow. The CDA revealed six recurrent discourses that together sustained a steep hierarchy and highly stratified social order within these clusters, which emphasizes exclusivity and-ironically and paradoxically-preserves the very secrecy the thread was originally initiated to explore. One main conclusion is that the secrecy paradox can be seen not as a mere influencing factor in communicative interaction but as an emergent social practice around which social structures, identities, and norms are formed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1701598
Primary Topic
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

This article explains the secrecy paradox, but don’t tell anyone!

David M. Bergman
Frontiers in Psychology
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
article

This article explains the secrecy paradox, but don’t tell anyone!

David M. Bergman
article en

Abstract

The present study examined how the secrecy paradox-signalling privileged knowledge while at the same time concealing its content to preserve exclusivity-affected communication in an online community. Data were a comprehensive discussion thread about the existence and location of a large secret underground command centre (a "Riksbunker") that would serve as the Swedish governments Cold War contingency plan for a potential World War III. The study used a mixed-method design combining critical discourse analysis (CDA) with citation network and community cluster analysis. Network analysis revealed a modular structure of tightly connected clusters with a small number of core users controlling the information flow. The CDA revealed six recurrent discourses that together sustained a steep hierarchy and highly stratified social order within these clusters, which emphasizes exclusivity and-ironically and paradoxically-preserves the very secrecy the thread was originally initiated to explore. One main conclusion is that the secrecy paradox can be seen not as a mere influencing factor in communicative interaction but as an emergent social practice around which social structures, identities, and norms are formed.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 17
Swedish Defence University (SE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

This article explains the secrecy paradox, but don’t tell anyone! — David M. Bergman · Frontiers in Psychology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS