The Gerasene Pericope and Disability Studies: Irony, Empire, and (In)complete Reintegration in Mk 5.1–20

This article rereads Mk 5.1–20 through Disability Studies and Mad Studies, presenting the Gerasene episode as social critique rather than a simple miracle narrative. ‘Legion’ functions as a marker of Roman domination and communal labelling that produce social disability and social death. Close analysis of δαιμονίζομαι, λεγιών, and σωϕρονέω shows how Mark grammatically preserves the man’s personhood and depicts restored judgment with social implications. The narrative’s irony exposes sanist assumptions and economic interests underlying the townspeople’s fear and their request for Jesus to leave. Jesus redirects the man’s desire ‘to be with’ him into a commission ‘to tell’ in the Decapolis, relocating authorized speech to a restored Gentile witness. Reintegration is reframed as vocation rather than return—(in)complete socially yet realized missionally through testimony that challenges colonial-sanist control and reorders communal value.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for the Study of the New Testament
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0142064x261418691
Primary Topic
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Gerasene Pericope and Disability Studies: Irony, Empire, and (In)complete Reintegration in Mk 5.1–20

Agnieszka Ziemińska
Journal for the Study of the New Testament
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
article

The Gerasene Pericope and Disability Studies: Irony, Empire, and (In)complete Reintegration in Mk 5.1–20

Agnieszka Ziemińska
article en

Abstract

This article rereads Mk 5.1–20 through Disability Studies and Mad Studies, presenting the Gerasene episode as social critique rather than a simple miracle narrative. ‘Legion’ functions as a marker of Roman domination and communal labelling that produce social disability and social death. Close analysis of δαιμονίζομαι, λεγιών, and σωϕρονέω shows how Mark grammatically preserves the man’s personhood and depicts restored judgment with social implications. The narrative’s irony exposes sanist assumptions and economic interests underlying the townspeople’s fear and their request for Jesus to leave. Jesus redirects the man’s desire ‘to be with’ him into a commission ‘to tell’ in the Decapolis, relocating authorized speech to a restored Gentile witness. Reintegration is reframed as vocation rather than return—(in)complete socially yet realized missionally through testimony that challenges colonial-sanist control and reorders communal value.

Journal for the Study of the New Testament
Pontifical University of John Paul II in Kraków (PL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.