Two-stage machine learning framework for investigating vapor bubble dynamics in nucleate flow boiling

Nucleate boiling is a highly efficient heat-transfer mechanism involving complex bubble dynamics that still remains difficult to predict. Traditional high-speed videography based experimental approaches are time and resource-consuming and generate large image datasets that demand automated processing. This study proposes a novel two-stage machine-learning framework for vapor bubble dynamics in nucleate flow boiling: Stage I employed a comparative evaluation of seven deep learning segmentation models (including DeepLabV3+, U-Net, and others) using three different loss functions, namely binary cross-entropy (BCE), Dice loss, and combined BCE-Dice loss, to precisely segment vapor bubble boundaries; Stage II involved a comparative analysis of four machine learning algorithm families and their variants to predict critical bubble dynamic parameters, including aspect ratio (AR), upstream and downstream contact angles ( θ u , θ d ), equivalent diameter ( d e q ), and base diameter ( d b ) from experiments in a vertical channel under varying subcooling (2–20 K), flow rate (6–40 lph), heat input (24–47 W), and normalized cycle time (0–1). Results demonstrated that DeepLabV3+ with combined BCE-Dice loss achieved superior performance (validation IoU 0.982, training IoU 0.977) with minimal parameter errors (8.28% for θ u , 9.71% for θ d , 1.49% for d e q , 2.27% for AR, and 4.47% for d b ) in Stage I. Moreover, the combined BCE-Dice loss function consistently outperformed individual loss functions across most segmentation models. The Bagging Regressor was the optimal predictor in Stage II (mean R 2 of 0.858; average error of 2.4, 5.4, 5.7, 6.7, and 8.2% for AR, θ u , θ d , d e q , and d b , respectively). This integrated approach automates both segmentation and bubble-parameter prediction, dramatically reducing manual processing and enabling rapid, data-driven design of boiling-based thermal systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI Thermal Fluids
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aitf.2026.100031
Primary Topic
Heat Transfer and Boiling Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two-stage machine learning framework for investigating vapor bubble dynamics in nucleate flow boiling

Mohd Moiz, A. K. Srivastava, Amogh Shetty
AI Thermal Fluids
Heat Transfer and Boiling Studies
article

Two-stage machine learning framework for investigating vapor bubble dynamics in nucleate flow boiling

Mohd Moiz, A. K. Srivastava, Amogh Shetty
article en

Abstract

Nucleate boiling is a highly efficient heat-transfer mechanism involving complex bubble dynamics that still remains difficult to predict. Traditional high-speed videography based experimental approaches are time and resource-consuming and generate large image datasets that demand automated processing. This study proposes a novel two-stage machine-learning framework for vapor bubble dynamics in nucleate flow boiling: Stage I employed a comparative evaluation of seven deep learning segmentation models (including DeepLabV3+, U-Net, and others) using three different loss functions, namely binary cross-entropy (BCE), Dice loss, and combined BCE-Dice loss, to precisely segment vapor bubble boundaries; Stage II involved a comparative analysis of four machine learning algorithm families and their variants to predict critical bubble dynamic parameters, including aspect ratio (AR), upstream and downstream contact angles ( θ u , θ d ), equivalent diameter ( d e q ), and base diameter ( d b ) from experiments in a vertical channel under varying subcooling (2–20 K), flow rate (6–40 lph), heat input (24–47 W), and normalized cycle time (0–1). Results demonstrated that DeepLabV3+ with combined BCE-Dice loss achieved superior performance (validation IoU 0.982, training IoU 0.977) with minimal parameter errors (8.28% for θ u , 9.71% for θ d , 1.49% for d e q , 2.27% for AR, and 4.47% for d b ) in Stage I. Moreover, the combined BCE-Dice loss function consistently outperformed individual loss functions across most segmentation models. The Bagging Regressor was the optimal predictor in Stage II (mean R 2 of 0.858; average error of 2.4, 5.4, 5.7, 6.7, and 8.2% for AR, θ u , θ d , d e q , and d b , respectively). This integrated approach automates both segmentation and bubble-parameter prediction, dramatically reducing manual processing and enabling rapid, data-driven design of boiling-based thermal systems.

AI Thermal FluidsVol. 5
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IN), Sardar Patel University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Heat Transfer and Boiling Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.