The Impacts of Removing College Entrance Exams: Evidence From the Test‐Optional Movement

ABSTRACT Before 2020, around 250 four‐year colleges and universities adopted a test‐optional application procedure that allowed students to apply for admission without submitting college entrance exam score. Many schools adopted this procedure to encourage greater racial and socioeconomic diversity. Unfortunately, we know little about the impact of these policies. In this paper, I use a difference‐in‐differences design to examine the impact of this reform on schools that adopted the policy between 2006 and 2014. Compared to schools that did not switch, test‐optional schools witnessed around a 15% increase in the enrollment of Black, Native American/Alaskan Native, and Hispanic students and around a 7% increase in the number of Pell Grant students. I also show that after switching, schools experienced an increase in the number of students receiving institutional grant aid, but decreases in the average aid granted. Institutions interested in adopting these policies should consider these possible unintended consequences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Southern Economic Journal
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.70028
Primary Topic
School Choice and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impacts of Removing College Entrance Exams: Evidence From the Test‐Optional Movement

Brianna Felegi
Southern Economic Journal
School Choice and Performance
article

The Impacts of Removing College Entrance Exams: Evidence From the Test‐Optional Movement

Brianna Felegi
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Before 2020, around 250 four‐year colleges and universities adopted a test‐optional application procedure that allowed students to apply for admission without submitting college entrance exam score. Many schools adopted this procedure to encourage greater racial and socioeconomic diversity. Unfortunately, we know little about the impact of these policies. In this paper, I use a difference‐in‐differences design to examine the impact of this reform on schools that adopted the policy between 2006 and 2014. Compared to schools that did not switch, test‐optional schools witnessed around a 15% increase in the enrollment of Black, Native American/Alaskan Native, and Hispanic students and around a 7% increase in the number of Pell Grant students. I also show that after switching, schools experienced an increase in the number of students receiving institutional grant aid, but decreases in the average aid granted. Institutions interested in adopting these policies should consider these possible unintended consequences.

Southern Economic Journal
Virginia Tech (US)
University of Notre Dame
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
School Choice and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Impacts of Removing College Entrance Exams: Evidence From the Test‐Optional Movement — Brianna Felegi · Southern Economic Journal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS