Difference between Half-mass Radius and Half-light Radius of Galaxies at 0.2 &lt; <i>z</i> &lt; 2.5 Revealed by JWST/NIRCam Data

Abstract Using JWST observations in CANDELS fields, we measure the half-light radius ( r e,light ) and half-mass–radius ( r e,mass ) for 14,333 galaxies with stellar masses M * &gt; 10 9 M ⊙ at redshifts 0.2 &lt; z &lt; 2.5. To investigate the difference between r e,light and r e,mass , we find that r e,light is larger than r e,mass for both quiescent galaxies (QGs) and star-forming galaxies (SFGs). Moreover, the difference between these two radii is clearly correlated with galaxy stellar mass, r e,light , and the rest-frame U − V color. When examining the evolution of the r e,mass / r e,light ratio, we observe a significant increase for SFGs at z &gt; 1.7. In contrast, no clear increase is observed for QGs at z &gt; 1, though a slight decreasing trend is seen between 0.2 &lt; z &lt; 1.0. By fitting a linear relationship between galaxy size and stellar mass, we find that the slope for r e,light is ∼0.1–0.3 dex larger than that for r e,mass . In terms of galaxy size evolution at a fixed stellar mass, the r e,mass of QGs increases by a factor of ∼3–5 from z ∼ 2.5 to z ∼ 0.2. In contrast, the r e,mass of SFGs increases by a factor of approximately 2 over the same redshift range, with this growth trend closely following that of their r e,light . These results indicate that previous insights into galaxy evolution based on r e,light remain valid when considering r e,mass , although the specific slopes show some variations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae3947
Primary Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Difference between Half-mass Radius and Half-light Radius of Galaxies at 0.2 < z < 2.5 Revealed by JWST/NIRCam Data

Shiying Lu, Zesen Lin, Guanwen Fang, Xu Kong et al.
The Astrophysical Journal
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
article

Difference between Half-mass Radius and Half-light Radius of Galaxies at 0.2 < z < 2.5 Revealed by JWST/NIRCam Data

Shiying Lu, Zesen Lin, Guanwen Fang, Xu Kong, Mingen Xin, Jie Song
article en

Abstract

Abstract Using JWST observations in CANDELS fields, we measure the half-light radius ( r e,light ) and half-mass–radius ( r e,mass ) for 14,333 galaxies with stellar masses M * &gt; 10 9 M ⊙ at redshifts 0.2 &lt; z &lt; 2.5. To investigate the difference between r e,light and r e,mass , we find that r e,light is larger than r e,mass for both quiescent galaxies (QGs) and star-forming galaxies (SFGs). Moreover, the difference between these two radii is clearly correlated with galaxy stellar mass, r e,light , and the rest-frame U − V color. When examining the evolution of the r e,mass / r e,light ratio, we observe a significant increase for SFGs at z &gt; 1.7. In contrast, no clear increase is observed for QGs at z &gt; 1, though a slight decreasing trend is seen between 0.2 &lt; z &lt; 1.0. By fitting a linear relationship between galaxy size and stellar mass, we find that the slope for r e,light is ∼0.1–0.3 dex larger than that for r e,mass . In terms of galaxy size evolution at a fixed stellar mass, the r e,mass of QGs increases by a factor of ∼3–5 from z ∼ 2.5 to z ∼ 0.2. In contrast, the r e,mass of SFGs increases by a factor of approximately 2 over the same redshift range, with this growth trend closely following that of their r e,light . These results indicate that previous insights into galaxy evolution based on r e,light remain valid when considering r e,mass , although the specific slopes show some variations.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 998(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.