A world without violence and domination, from Athens to Kyiv: In dialogue with Jeffrey C. Alexander

Can we imagine a world without wars, violence and domination? What does it take to build such a society? I pose the above questions as an attempt to dialogue with Jeffrey Alexander's analysis of the paradoxical nature of the modern ‘civil sphere’ in a time of local and global turmoil. In this dialogue, I restate some of the key claims from Alexander's analysis and offer possible ways of conceptualising and re-imagining a more humanistic, responsive and ethical civil sphere. Contrary to Alexander, I argue that at the centre of the crisis of the civil sphere is not how its conceptions are always informed by an unproductive and antagonistic binarism. But the root problem has got to do with how the civil sphere has tolerated or become invaded by private class interests. As a result, the greatest undoing of the modern civil sphere lies in its furtherance of a distinctive class/economic position. To understand or unravel the ‘paradox’ that Alexander discusses in his piece, I suggest the need to focus more on broader socio-economic dynamics. As I will show, these broader socio-economic processes are central not only in shaping the nature of the civil sphere, but also in the re-production of endless violence, wars and human domination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dialogues in sociology.
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/29768667261420952
Primary Topic
Sociology and Norbert Elias
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A world without violence and domination, from Athens to Kyiv: In dialogue with Jeffrey C. Alexander

Tawanda Sydesky Nyawasha
Dialogues in sociology.
Sociology and Norbert Elias
article

A world without violence and domination, from Athens to Kyiv: In dialogue with Jeffrey C. Alexander

Tawanda Sydesky Nyawasha
article en

Abstract

Can we imagine a world without wars, violence and domination? What does it take to build such a society? I pose the above questions as an attempt to dialogue with Jeffrey Alexander's analysis of the paradoxical nature of the modern ‘civil sphere’ in a time of local and global turmoil. In this dialogue, I restate some of the key claims from Alexander's analysis and offer possible ways of conceptualising and re-imagining a more humanistic, responsive and ethical civil sphere. Contrary to Alexander, I argue that at the centre of the crisis of the civil sphere is not how its conceptions are always informed by an unproductive and antagonistic binarism. But the root problem has got to do with how the civil sphere has tolerated or become invaded by private class interests. As a result, the greatest undoing of the modern civil sphere lies in its furtherance of a distinctive class/economic position. To understand or unravel the ‘paradox’ that Alexander discusses in his piece, I suggest the need to focus more on broader socio-economic dynamics. As I will show, these broader socio-economic processes are central not only in shaping the nature of the civil sphere, but also in the re-production of endless violence, wars and human domination.

Dialogues in sociology.
University of Ulster (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Sociology and Norbert Elias
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A world without violence and domination, from Athens to Kyiv: In dialogue with Jeffrey C. Alexander — Tawanda Sydesky Nyawasha · Dialogues in sociology. (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS