Insurance Deductions from Clinical Documentation Gaps: A Data Quality Perspective

Introduction: A significant portion of hospitals' financial resources is acquired through contracts with insurance companies. Insurance companies often reject claims or impose deductions on hospitals for various reasons, with poor medical record documentation being a major factor. This study aimed to identify the causes and extent of social security insurance deductions while evaluating which dimensions of data quality in medical records were compromised due to inadequate documentation. Method: This descriptive cross -sectional study was conducted in 2024 at Shahid Sadoughi Hospital in Yazd, divided into two phases. In the first phase, data collection was carried out using a checklist to extract services subject to deductions from 893 medical records covered by social security insurance. After grouping these services, the causes and extent of deductions were identified for each service group. In the second phase, documentation -related deductions were categorized according to data quality dimensions. Data analysis was performed using Excel and SPSS, employing descriptive statistics. Results: The highest deduction rate was observed in the emergency department at 24.1%, while the intensive care units had total deductions amounting to 2,980,112,989 rials. By service group, the greatest deductions were related to nursing care services (22.9%) and diagnostic tests (18%). Overall, documentation deficiencies represented the largest proportion of deductions at 45.3%. Within the data quality dimensions, incomplete documentation was the most frequent cause (62.4%). Conclusion: Documentation deficiencies, particularly regarding data completeness, significantly contribute to hospital deductions. Health information systems can help by offering a standardized format for electronic data recording and alerts for essential information. Additionally, it is recommended that physicians and other healthcare providers receive training on documentation practices that align with insurance payment guidelines. Furthermore, regular audits and feedback should be implemented to ensure continuous improvement and maintain the quality of medical record data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health and Biomedical Informatics
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34172/jhbmi.2025.22
Primary Topic
Medical Coding and Health Information
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Insurance Deductions from Clinical Documentation Gaps: A Data Quality Perspective

Yaser Ghelmani, Shokoofeh Afkhami, Mahtab Karami, Monireh Sadeqi Jabali
Journal of Health and Biomedical Informatics
Medical Coding and Health Information
article

Insurance Deductions from Clinical Documentation Gaps: A Data Quality Perspective

Yaser Ghelmani, Shokoofeh Afkhami, Mahtab Karami, Monireh Sadeqi Jabali
article en

Abstract

Introduction: A significant portion of hospitals' financial resources is acquired through contracts with insurance companies. Insurance companies often reject claims or impose deductions on hospitals for various reasons, with poor medical record documentation being a major factor. This study aimed to identify the causes and extent of social security insurance deductions while evaluating which dimensions of data quality in medical records were compromised due to inadequate documentation. Method: This descriptive cross -sectional study was conducted in 2024 at Shahid Sadoughi Hospital in Yazd, divided into two phases. In the first phase, data collection was carried out using a checklist to extract services subject to deductions from 893 medical records covered by social security insurance. After grouping these services, the causes and extent of deductions were identified for each service group. In the second phase, documentation -related deductions were categorized according to data quality dimensions. Data analysis was performed using Excel and SPSS, employing descriptive statistics. Results: The highest deduction rate was observed in the emergency department at 24.1%, while the intensive care units had total deductions amounting to 2,980,112,989 rials. By service group, the greatest deductions were related to nursing care services (22.9%) and diagnostic tests (18%). Overall, documentation deficiencies represented the largest proportion of deductions at 45.3%. Within the data quality dimensions, incomplete documentation was the most frequent cause (62.4%). Conclusion: Documentation deficiencies, particularly regarding data completeness, significantly contribute to hospital deductions. Health information systems can help by offering a standardized format for electronic data recording and alerts for essential information. Additionally, it is recommended that physicians and other healthcare providers receive training on documentation practices that align with insurance payment guidelines. Furthermore, regular audits and feedback should be implemented to ensure continuous improvement and maintain the quality of medical record data.

Journal of Health and Biomedical InformaticsVol. 12(2)
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IR), Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services (IR), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Medical Coding and Health Information
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.