Theses on Intellectual Ownership, Open Science, and the Social Responsibility of Research.

This manifesto articulates a normative and ethical framework for understanding intellectual ownership, open science, and the social responsibility of research in the contemporary knowledge economy. It argues that the privatization of knowledge and the institutionalization of delayed dissemination have transformed scientific production into a system of exclusion, enclosure, and epistemic inequality. Against this model, the text defends science as a public good and knowledge as a collective social product rather than a proprietary commodity. Drawing on ethical reflection, institutional critique, and lived academic experience, the manifesto examines how copyright regimes, prestige hierarchies, and publication systems function as mechanisms of knowledge control, producing delays in truth, restrictions on access, and asymmetries of power. It advances open science not merely as a technical publishing model but as a moral and social obligation, grounded in the responsibility of researchers to society. The manifesto calls for preprint dissemination, resistance to knowledge enclosure, and the reassertion of science as a common good, proposing an ethics of research based on transparency, accessibility, epistemic justice, and collective responsibility.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18615898
Primary Topic
Academic Publishing and Open Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Theses on Intellectual Ownership, Open Science, and the Social Responsibility of Research.

Marcello Vittorio Ferrada de Noli
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Academic Publishing and Open Access
article

Theses on Intellectual Ownership, Open Science, and the Social Responsibility of Research.

Marcello Vittorio Ferrada de Noli
article en

Abstract

This manifesto articulates a normative and ethical framework for understanding intellectual ownership, open science, and the social responsibility of research in the contemporary knowledge economy. It argues that the privatization of knowledge and the institutionalization of delayed dissemination have transformed scientific production into a system of exclusion, enclosure, and epistemic inequality. Against this model, the text defends science as a public good and knowledge as a collective social product rather than a proprietary commodity. Drawing on ethical reflection, institutional critique, and lived academic experience, the manifesto examines how copyright regimes, prestige hierarchies, and publication systems function as mechanisms of knowledge control, producing delays in truth, restrictions on access, and asymmetries of power. It advances open science not merely as a technical publishing model but as a moral and social obligation, grounded in the responsibility of researchers to society. The manifesto calls for preprint dissemination, resistance to knowledge enclosure, and the reassertion of science as a common good, proposing an ethics of research based on transparency, accessibility, epistemic justice, and collective responsibility.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Academic Publishing and Open Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.