Equity in the allocation of professional public health human resources and its improvement path in China

Professional public health human resources (PPHHRs) are fundamental to determining a nation’s capacity to respond to public health emergencies. To address the critical challenge of inequitable PPHHRs allocation in China, this study systematically evaluated the current state of allocation equity, investigated its underlying determinants, and identified potential pathways for improvement. The findings provide evidence-based recommendations for achieving optimal PPHHRs distribution across China. The equity of human resource allocation in professional public health in China was measured by calculating the health resource density index (HRDI) of health technicians in professional public health institutions. We integrated Necessary condition analysis (NCA) and fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to identify critical factors and effective pathways influencing the equity of PPHHRs allocation in China. The allocation of PPHHRs in China showed significant disparities across regions and provinces. The western region and its provinces demonstrated lower equity in PPHHRs allocation compared to the eastern and central regions. No single necessary condition was found to affect the equity of PPHHRs allocation. Based on configurational analysis, four condition configurations were identified that lead to high equity in PPHHRs allocation. The analysis demonstrates that high equity in PPHHR allocation is achievable through multiple distinct configurations, with no single condition being formally necessary. The findings reveal that high equity in the allocation of PPHHRs in China is achieved through multiple distinct configurations of conditions, with no single factor being necessary. For western and other equity-disadvantaged provinces constrained by low population density and limited fiscal capacity, the key strategy is to establish a centrally-led, locally-collaborative systematic intervention system that provides external support to compensate for inherent disadvantages. For regions that already possess certain foundational conditions, efforts should focus on enhancing the synergistic effects across social, governmental, residential, and economic dimensions to promote sustainable high-quality equity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-14164-3
Primary Topic
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Equity in the allocation of professional public health human resources and its improvement path in China

Yuqing Mi, Jingwen Huang, Xiaochen Feng, Yuzhuo Liu et al.
BMC Health Services Research
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
article

Equity in the allocation of professional public health human resources and its improvement path in China

Yuqing Mi, Jingwen Huang, Xiaochen Feng, Yuzhuo Liu, Yongqiang Wang, Ran Wang, Wei Li
article en

Abstract

Professional public health human resources (PPHHRs) are fundamental to determining a nation’s capacity to respond to public health emergencies. To address the critical challenge of inequitable PPHHRs allocation in China, this study systematically evaluated the current state of allocation equity, investigated its underlying determinants, and identified potential pathways for improvement. The findings provide evidence-based recommendations for achieving optimal PPHHRs distribution across China. The equity of human resource allocation in professional public health in China was measured by calculating the health resource density index (HRDI) of health technicians in professional public health institutions. We integrated Necessary condition analysis (NCA) and fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to identify critical factors and effective pathways influencing the equity of PPHHRs allocation in China. The allocation of PPHHRs in China showed significant disparities across regions and provinces. The western region and its provinces demonstrated lower equity in PPHHRs allocation compared to the eastern and central regions. No single necessary condition was found to affect the equity of PPHHRs allocation. Based on configurational analysis, four condition configurations were identified that lead to high equity in PPHHRs allocation. The analysis demonstrates that high equity in PPHHR allocation is achievable through multiple distinct configurations, with no single condition being formally necessary. The findings reveal that high equity in the allocation of PPHHRs in China is achieved through multiple distinct configurations of conditions, with no single factor being necessary. For western and other equity-disadvantaged provinces constrained by low population density and limited fiscal capacity, the key strategy is to establish a centrally-led, locally-collaborative systematic intervention system that provides external support to compensate for inherent disadvantages. For regions that already possess certain foundational conditions, efforts should focus on enhancing the synergistic effects across social, governmental, residential, and economic dimensions to promote sustainable high-quality equity.

BMC Health Services ResearchVol. 26(1)
Weifang Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.