Examining the Relationship Between Nurses’ Moral Distress and Quality of Life During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background and aims: Nurses employed in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) units experienced extensive moral distress (MD), which could affect their quality of life (QOL). Hence, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between nurses’ MD and QOL and factors related to them during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This descriptive-correlational study included 200 nurses employed in the COVID-19 wards of Medical Sciences Hospitals in Jiroft, Kerman, Iran, selected through a census sampling method. Required data were collected using a demographic questionnaire, the Corley MD Assessment Scale, and the World Health Organization QOL Scale. Descriptive statistics and stepwise multiple linear regression analyses were conducted using SPSS 22, with a significance level set at 0.05. Results: Nurses’ mean MD was 68.52±37.32 (low), and the mean QOL score was 56.00±17.67 (moderate). An inverse and significant relationship was observed between MD scores and QOL (r=-0.195, P=0.006). The results of the linear regression test demonstrated that MD, gender, and position, with standard beta coefficients of 0.289, 0.187, and 0.171, respectively, had the highest regression effect on the QOL of nurses. Conclusion: Although nurses working in the COVID-19 wards experienced low levels of MD, considering the moderate level of QOL, the impact of MD, and some background characteristics, it is suggested that health policymakers pay closer attention to develop mechanisms to control and reduce MD while improving QOL.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Multidisciplinary Care
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34172/jmdc.1399
Primary Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the Relationship Between Nurses’ Moral Distress and Quality of Life During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study

Maryam Khandan, Habibe Amirmohammadi
Journal of Multidisciplinary Care
Ethics in medical practice
article

Examining the Relationship Between Nurses’ Moral Distress and Quality of Life During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study

Maryam Khandan, Habibe Amirmohammadi
article en

Abstract

Background and aims: Nurses employed in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) units experienced extensive moral distress (MD), which could affect their quality of life (QOL). Hence, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between nurses’ MD and QOL and factors related to them during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This descriptive-correlational study included 200 nurses employed in the COVID-19 wards of Medical Sciences Hospitals in Jiroft, Kerman, Iran, selected through a census sampling method. Required data were collected using a demographic questionnaire, the Corley MD Assessment Scale, and the World Health Organization QOL Scale. Descriptive statistics and stepwise multiple linear regression analyses were conducted using SPSS 22, with a significance level set at 0.05. Results: Nurses’ mean MD was 68.52±37.32 (low), and the mean QOL score was 56.00±17.67 (moderate). An inverse and significant relationship was observed between MD scores and QOL (r=-0.195, P=0.006). The results of the linear regression test demonstrated that MD, gender, and position, with standard beta coefficients of 0.289, 0.187, and 0.171, respectively, had the highest regression effect on the QOL of nurses. Conclusion: Although nurses working in the COVID-19 wards experienced low levels of MD, considering the moderate level of QOL, the impact of MD, and some background characteristics, it is suggested that health policymakers pay closer attention to develop mechanisms to control and reduce MD while improving QOL.

Journal of Multidisciplinary CareVol. 13(4)
Islamic Azad University Kerman (IR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Ethics in medical practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.