UKRN Working Paper 9: UKRN Open Research Indicators: Final Report

This working paper reports on six pilot projects conducted as part of the UK Reproducibility Network’s Open Research Programme (ORP) to explore the feasibility of developing automated indicators for monitoring open research practices across UK universities. The pilots examined data quality, metadata standards, and automated extraction methods across six areas: FAIR data, open data, data availability statements, downstream effects of data sharing, pre-registration, and the use of the CRediT taxonomy. The findings highlight areas of promise, particularly pre-registration and elements of FAIRness, while also identifying major challenges related to inconsistent metadata, terminology, and workflows. The report outlines key recommendations for improving interoperability, enhancing data standards, and supporting the responsible development of future monitoring infrastructure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18624686
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

UKRN Working Paper 9: UKRN Open Research Indicators: Final Report

Sally Dalton, C. T. Tibbs, R Pajor, Johanna Elise Groothuizen et al.
ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)
Research Data Management Practices
article

UKRN Working Paper 9: UKRN Open Research Indicators: Final Report

Sally Dalton, C. T. Tibbs, R Pajor, Johanna Elise Groothuizen, mick eadie, Etienne B. Roesch, Alice Howarth, NE Sheppard, Mary Donaldson, Alastair Arthur, Leonidas Pispiringas, Amanda Boll, Lavinia Gambelli, Neil Jacobs, Kerry Miller, Étienne Vignola‐Gagné, Kirsty Merrett, Nicola Barnett, Gillian Currie, Daryl B. O'Connor, Phillip Hall, Angus Taggart, Laurian Williamson, Jonathon Timothy Newton, Iain Hrynaszkiewicz, Euan Adie, Timothy Vines, Anita de Waard, Jade Godsall
article en

Abstract

This working paper reports on six pilot projects conducted as part of the UK Reproducibility Network’s Open Research Programme (ORP) to explore the feasibility of developing automated indicators for monitoring open research practices across UK universities. The pilots examined data quality, metadata standards, and automated extraction methods across six areas: FAIR data, open data, data availability statements, downstream effects of data sharing, pre-registration, and the use of the CRediT taxonomy. The findings highlight areas of promise, particularly pre-registration and elements of FAIRness, while also identifying major challenges related to inconsistent metadata, terminology, and workflows. The report outlines key recommendations for improving interoperability, enhancing data standards, and supporting the responsible development of future monitoring infrastructure.

ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)
University of Leeds (GB), RELX Group (Netherlands) (NL), University of Liverpool (GB), King's College London (GB), Leeds Trinity University (GB), Overton Brooks VA Medical Center (US), Athena Research and Innovation Center In Information Communication & Knowledge Technologies (GR), Data Management (Italy) (IT), University of Reading (GB), University of Glasgow (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Research England
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Research Data Management Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.