Hypertonic saline in non–cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (Hyper-BRONCHI): an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Airway clearance is essential in managing bronchiectasis, yet the benefit of inhaled hypertonic saline (HS) in non–cystic fibrosis (non-CF) disease remains unclear. While HS improves mucociliary clearance and clinical outcomes in cystic fibrosis, supporting evidence in non-CF bronchiectasis has been limited. With newly available trial data, this updated meta-analysis reassesses the efficacy of inhaled HS in adults with non-CF bronchiectasis. We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Embase for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing inhaled HS with control group (Non-HS), either isotonic saline or standard of care, in adults with non-CF bronchiectasis. Outcomes included changes in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁), forced vital capacity (FVC), and pulmonary exacerbation frequency within 52 weeks. The risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane tool. A random-effects model was applied. Four RCTs involving 386 adults were included. Compared with Non-HS, HS did not significantly improve FEV₁ (SMD 0.03; 95% CI − 0.07 to 0.13; low certainty) or FVC (SMD 0.10; 95% CI − 0.06 to 0.25; low certainty), and pulmonary exacerbation rates (SMD − 0.02; 95% CI − 0.48 to 0.45; very low certainty). In adults with non-CF bronchiectasis, inhaled HS offers no meaningful advantage over Non-HS for lung function or exacerbation reduction. Larger, high-quality RCTs are needed to identify potential benefits. Question: Does inhaled hypertonic saline (HS) provide better lung function outcomes for patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (non-CF bronchiectasis) ? Finding: Overall, hypertonic saline (HS) yielded outcomes comparable to those of the non-HS group (including isotonic saline or standard of care) with respect to FEV₁, FVC, and the annual number of pulmonary exacerbations. These findings were consistent during long-term follow-up of up to 52 weeks. Meaning: Up to date, the data on HS inhaled therapy for non-CF bronchiectasis is limited in high-quality studies, highlighting the need for further non-CF bronchiectasis-specific RCTs, focusing on HS of NaCl 6–7%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-026-04176-4
Primary Topic
Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hypertonic saline in non–cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (Hyper-BRONCHI): an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Nga Nguyen, Jafar Aljazeeri, Victoria Ho, Yacin Zawam et al.
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
article

Hypertonic saline in non–cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (Hyper-BRONCHI): an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Nga Nguyen, Jafar Aljazeeri, Victoria Ho, Yacin Zawam, Vy Ngoc Dan Nguyen, N B Tran, Nathalia Alves de Barros E Lyra, Ha Duc Thien Le, David Downes
article en

Abstract

Airway clearance is essential in managing bronchiectasis, yet the benefit of inhaled hypertonic saline (HS) in non–cystic fibrosis (non-CF) disease remains unclear. While HS improves mucociliary clearance and clinical outcomes in cystic fibrosis, supporting evidence in non-CF bronchiectasis has been limited. With newly available trial data, this updated meta-analysis reassesses the efficacy of inhaled HS in adults with non-CF bronchiectasis. We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Embase for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing inhaled HS with control group (Non-HS), either isotonic saline or standard of care, in adults with non-CF bronchiectasis. Outcomes included changes in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁), forced vital capacity (FVC), and pulmonary exacerbation frequency within 52 weeks. The risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane tool. A random-effects model was applied. Four RCTs involving 386 adults were included. Compared with Non-HS, HS did not significantly improve FEV₁ (SMD 0.03; 95% CI − 0.07 to 0.13; low certainty) or FVC (SMD 0.10; 95% CI − 0.06 to 0.25; low certainty), and pulmonary exacerbation rates (SMD − 0.02; 95% CI − 0.48 to 0.45; very low certainty). In adults with non-CF bronchiectasis, inhaled HS offers no meaningful advantage over Non-HS for lung function or exacerbation reduction. Larger, high-quality RCTs are needed to identify potential benefits. Question: Does inhaled hypertonic saline (HS) provide better lung function outcomes for patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (non-CF bronchiectasis) ? Finding: Overall, hypertonic saline (HS) yielded outcomes comparable to those of the non-HS group (including isotonic saline or standard of care) with respect to FEV₁, FVC, and the annual number of pulmonary exacerbations. These findings were consistent during long-term follow-up of up to 52 weeks. Meaning: Up to date, the data on HS inhaled therapy for non-CF bronchiectasis is limited in high-quality studies, highlighting the need for further non-CF bronchiectasis-specific RCTs, focusing on HS of NaCl 6–7%.

BMC Pulmonary MedicineVol. 26(1)
University of Debrecen (HU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Military Hospital (PK), Faculdade Frassinetti do Recife (BR), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US), Southern Ohio Medical Center (US), Faculdade Pernambucana de Saúde, Drexel University (US), University of New England (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.