An individualized prognostic model for survival prediction in gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma

Gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma (G-EAC) is a rare but highly aggressive malignant tumor. This study aimed to develop and validate a prognostic nomogram to accurately predict overall survival (OS) for patients with G-EAC. A total of 385 patients with G-EAC were included, comprising 346 from the SEER database and 39 patients from our hospital as an external validation set. The SEER cohort was randomly split in a 7:3 ratio into a development set (n = 241) and an internal validation set (n = 105). Predictive factors were identified in the development set using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, and a model for OS was constructed and visualized as a nomogram. The predictive performance of the model was evaluated using concordance index (C-index) and time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) in both internal and external validation. The final prognostic model included six independent predictors: age at diagnosis, tumor stage, T stage, tumor size, primary site surgery, and chemotherapy. The C-index values were 0.88 (95% CI 0.81–0.96), 0.88 (95% CI 0.76–0.99) and 0.87 (95% CI 0.69–1.00) for the development set, internal validation and external validation set, respectively. In the development set, the time-dependent AUROCs for 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90–0.98), 0.93 (95% CI: 0.89–0.99), and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.87–0.97), respectively. The corresponding values in the internal validation set were 0.98 (95% CI: 0.95–1.00), 0.92 (95% CI: 0.88–0.98), and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.83–0.98), and in the external validation cohort were 0.97 (95% CI: 0.92–1.00), 0.77 (95% CI: 0.53–0.99), and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.32–1.00). We developed and validated a nomogram with good discriminative ability for predicting OS in patients with G-EAC. This tool may assist clinicians in identifying high-risk patients and guiding individualized treatment decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Oncology
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-026-04569-1
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An individualized prognostic model for survival prediction in gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma

Shangdan Xie, Wei� Jin, Haiyan Zhu, XinWei Tao et al.
Discover Oncology
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

An individualized prognostic model for survival prediction in gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma

Shangdan Xie, Wei� Jin, Haiyan Zhu, XinWei Tao, LuZan Ma, XinTao Wang
article en

Abstract

Gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma (G-EAC) is a rare but highly aggressive malignant tumor. This study aimed to develop and validate a prognostic nomogram to accurately predict overall survival (OS) for patients with G-EAC. A total of 385 patients with G-EAC were included, comprising 346 from the SEER database and 39 patients from our hospital as an external validation set. The SEER cohort was randomly split in a 7:3 ratio into a development set (n = 241) and an internal validation set (n = 105). Predictive factors were identified in the development set using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, and a model for OS was constructed and visualized as a nomogram. The predictive performance of the model was evaluated using concordance index (C-index) and time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) in both internal and external validation. The final prognostic model included six independent predictors: age at diagnosis, tumor stage, T stage, tumor size, primary site surgery, and chemotherapy. The C-index values were 0.88 (95% CI 0.81–0.96), 0.88 (95% CI 0.76–0.99) and 0.87 (95% CI 0.69–1.00) for the development set, internal validation and external validation set, respectively. In the development set, the time-dependent AUROCs for 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90–0.98), 0.93 (95% CI: 0.89–0.99), and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.87–0.97), respectively. The corresponding values in the internal validation set were 0.98 (95% CI: 0.95–1.00), 0.92 (95% CI: 0.88–0.98), and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.83–0.98), and in the external validation cohort were 0.97 (95% CI: 0.92–1.00), 0.77 (95% CI: 0.53–0.99), and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.32–1.00). We developed and validated a nomogram with good discriminative ability for predicting OS in patients with G-EAC. This tool may assist clinicians in identifying high-risk patients and guiding individualized treatment decisions.

Discover OncologyVol. 17(1)
Xuzhou Medical College (CN), Boston Scientific (United States) (US), Second People’s Hospital of Huai’an (CN), Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.