Sustainable HRM in the Public Sector: A Question of Viability or Legitimacy?

ABSTRACT Recent research has underlined the growing importance of sustainability in HRM policy and practice, taking into account long‐term multi‐stakeholder goals. However, few studies have specified the drivers and outcomes of sustainable HRM practices, nor the contradictions that arise when managers attempt to satisfy the demands of both internal and external stakeholders. Drawing on in‐depth case studies of the UK public sector, we distinguish between the institutional sustainability logics of (i) viability (concerned with necessary resources and capacities to deliver) and (ii) legitimacy (concerned with satisfying social and moral demands for fair and consistent HR practices) and explore how these two logics interact through positive and negative feedback loops. Our findings show that across an increasingly complex HRM eco‐system, the tensions between viability and legitimacy are increasingly addressed through a focus on building individual human capital and personal wellbeing rather than protecting job security and the collective ‘common good’.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Resource Management Journal
Published
2026-02-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.70034
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainable HRM in the Public Sector: A Question of Viability or Legitimacy?

M. A. Johnson, Stephen Mustchin, Aristea Koukiadaki, Damian Grimshaw
Human Resource Management Journal
Environmental Sustainability in Business
article

Sustainable HRM in the Public Sector: A Question of Viability or Legitimacy?

M. A. Johnson, Stephen Mustchin, Aristea Koukiadaki, Damian Grimshaw
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Recent research has underlined the growing importance of sustainability in HRM policy and practice, taking into account long‐term multi‐stakeholder goals. However, few studies have specified the drivers and outcomes of sustainable HRM practices, nor the contradictions that arise when managers attempt to satisfy the demands of both internal and external stakeholders. Drawing on in‐depth case studies of the UK public sector, we distinguish between the institutional sustainability logics of (i) viability (concerned with necessary resources and capacities to deliver) and (ii) legitimacy (concerned with satisfying social and moral demands for fair and consistent HR practices) and explore how these two logics interact through positive and negative feedback loops. Our findings show that across an increasingly complex HRM eco‐system, the tensions between viability and legitimacy are increasingly addressed through a focus on building individual human capital and personal wellbeing rather than protecting job security and the collective ‘common good’.

Human Resource Management Journal
King's College London (GB), University of Manchester (GB), King's College School (GB)
Alliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sustainable HRM in the Public Sector: A Question of Viability or Legitimacy? — M. A. Johnson, Stephen Mustchin, et al. · Human Resource Management Journal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS