Utility of the US Metabolic Syndrome Severity Calculator for Group-Level Comparison in Estonia

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is globally prevalent, highlighting the need for easy risk identification. This study determined the MetS severity score in different groups of women in Estonia using a calculator developed based on the US population. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: The sample included 153 women (20-50 years): commercial diet plan (CDP) users, physically active women (physical activity, PA, >5 h/week), and a control group (CG). The factors assessed included age, gender, body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, and fasting glucose, yielding a MetS percentile and Z-score. Statistical analyses comprised descriptive statistics, <i>t</i>-tests, and χ<sup>2</sup> tests. Differences were considered statistically significant at <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05 and at <0.017 when comparing the three study groups. <i>Results</i>: The PA group was younger and had a lower BMI (<i>p</i> < 0.05), while the CDP group had lower HDL cholesterol levels (<i>p</i> < 0.017). MetS percentiles were higher in the CDP group (vs. PA <i>p</i> = 0.002; vs. CG <i>p</i> = 0.016). Despite having a lower Z-score than US women, the CDP group showed higher MetS severity levels (>1). <i>Conclusions</i>: The US calculator is also suitable for comparing different MetS risk study groups located outside the US, but for assessing individual MetS risk, it must be adapted and validated for the relevant population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62020363
Primary Topic
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Utility of the US Metabolic Syndrome Severity Calculator for Group-Level Comparison in Estonia

Anna-Liisa Tamm, Ülle Parm, Heete Kuuskla
Medicina
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
article

Utility of the US Metabolic Syndrome Severity Calculator for Group-Level Comparison in Estonia

Anna-Liisa Tamm, Ülle Parm, Heete Kuuskla
article en

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is globally prevalent, highlighting the need for easy risk identification. This study determined the MetS severity score in different groups of women in Estonia using a calculator developed based on the US population. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: The sample included 153 women (20-50 years): commercial diet plan (CDP) users, physically active women (physical activity, PA, >5 h/week), and a control group (CG). The factors assessed included age, gender, body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, and fasting glucose, yielding a MetS percentile and Z-score. Statistical analyses comprised descriptive statistics, <i>t</i>-tests, and χ<sup>2</sup> tests. Differences were considered statistically significant at <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05 and at <0.017 when comparing the three study groups. <i>Results</i>: The PA group was younger and had a lower BMI (<i>p</i> < 0.05), while the CDP group had lower HDL cholesterol levels (<i>p</i> < 0.017). MetS percentiles were higher in the CDP group (vs. PA <i>p</i> = 0.002; vs. CG <i>p</i> = 0.016). Despite having a lower Z-score than US women, the CDP group showed higher MetS severity levels (>1). <i>Conclusions</i>: The US calculator is also suitable for comparing different MetS risk study groups located outside the US, but for assessing individual MetS risk, it must be adapted and validated for the relevant population.

MedicinaVol. 62(2)
Tartu Health Care College (EE)
Tartu Ülikool
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Utility of the US Metabolic Syndrome Severity Calculator for Group-Level Comparison in Estonia — Anna-Liisa Tamm, Ülle Parm, et al. · Medicina (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS