Competing cognitive pressures on human exploration in the absence of trade-off with exploitation

Exploring novel environments through sequential sampling is essential for efficient decision-making under uncertainty. In the laboratory, human exploration has been studied in situations where it is traded against reward maximisation. By design, these 'explore-exploit' dilemmas confound the behavioural characteristics of exploration with those of the trade-off itself. Here, we propose a sequential sampling task where exploration can be compared in the presence and absence of trade-off with exploitation. Detailed model-based analyses of choices reveal specific exploration patterns arising when information seeking is not traded against reward seeking or influenced by prospective value. Human choices are directed toward the most uncertain option available, but only after an initial sampling phase consisting of repeated choices from each novel option. These findings outline competing cognitive pressures on information seeking: the repeated sampling of the current option (local uncertainty minimisation), and the directed sampling of the most uncertain option available (global uncertainty minimisation).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-68639-2
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Competing cognitive pressures on human exploration in the absence of trade-off with exploitation

Clemence Almeras, Valentin Wyart, Valérian Chambon
Nature Communications
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

Competing cognitive pressures on human exploration in the absence of trade-off with exploitation

Clemence Almeras, Valentin Wyart, Valérian Chambon
article en

Abstract

Exploring novel environments through sequential sampling is essential for efficient decision-making under uncertainty. In the laboratory, human exploration has been studied in situations where it is traded against reward maximisation. By design, these 'explore-exploit' dilemmas confound the behavioural characteristics of exploration with those of the trade-off itself. Here, we propose a sequential sampling task where exploration can be compared in the presence and absence of trade-off with exploitation. Detailed model-based analyses of choices reveal specific exploration patterns arising when information seeking is not traded against reward seeking or influenced by prospective value. Human choices are directed toward the most uncertain option available, but only after an initial sampling phase consisting of repeated choices from each novel option. These findings outline competing cognitive pressures on information seeking: the repeated sampling of the current option (local uncertainty minimisation), and the directed sampling of the most uncertain option available (global uncertainty minimisation).

Nature CommunicationsVol. 17(1)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Inserm (FR), Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR), École Normale Supérieure - PSL (FR), École Normale Supérieure (BI), Institut Jean Nicod (FR), Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives (FR), Institut de Psychiatrie et Neurosciences de Paris (FR)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.