Comparison of Featurizers and Binary Classification Models on the Proinflammatory Prediction Task

This project compares several featurization strategies and machine-learning classification models for predicting whether peptides are pro-inflammatory. Because the training dataset was highly imbalanced, up-sampling was applied to increase the minority (positive) class. Three feature representations were explored: amino-acid composition, amino-acid physicochemical characteristics, and k-mer (bag-of-words) representations. For each featurization, multiple classification models were trained and evaluated, including logistic regression, support vector machines, decision tree, random forest, gradient boosting, AdaBoost, and a neural network model. Model performance was compared using confusion matrices and ROC curves. Across all approaches, Random Forest consistently produced the highest AUC values, indicating superior predictive power compared with the other models, due to a combination of method sophistication and performance in over-training regimes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Open MIND
Published
2026-01-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13021/mars/15261
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Featurizers and Binary Classification Models on the Proinflammatory Prediction Task

Olivia Plaku
Open MIND
Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
article

Comparison of Featurizers and Binary Classification Models on the Proinflammatory Prediction Task

Olivia Plaku
article en

Abstract

This project compares several featurization strategies and machine-learning classification models for predicting whether peptides are pro-inflammatory. Because the training dataset was highly imbalanced, up-sampling was applied to increase the minority (positive) class. Three feature representations were explored: amino-acid composition, amino-acid physicochemical characteristics, and k-mer (bag-of-words) representations. For each featurization, multiple classification models were trained and evaluated, including logistic regression, support vector machines, decision tree, random forest, gradient boosting, AdaBoost, and a neural network model. Model performance was compared using confusion matrices and ROC curves. Across all approaches, Random Forest consistently produced the highest AUC values, indicating superior predictive power compared with the other models, due to a combination of method sophistication and performance in over-training regimes.

Open MIND
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of Featurizers and Binary Classification Models on the Proinflammatory Prediction Task — Olivia Plaku · Open MIND (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS