Trust undone: How COVID-19 coverage shaped scientists’ trust in journalism and their willingness to engage with the media

This study explores how scientists' experiences during the pandemic influenced their trust in journalism and their willingness to engage with the media. The study employed a survey approach, collecting data from 4089 scientists affiliated with German universities and research institutions. Trust in journalism was measured across five dimensions: appropriate topic selection, accurate representation, proper fact selection, fair assessment, and desirable impact. Structural equation modeling was used to analyze the relationships between dissatisfaction with pandemic-era media coverage, trust in journalism, and scientists' willingness to engage in science communication. Results show that scientists' trust in news media is generally limited and varies across media types. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated distrust, particularly in media outlets expected to maintain high standards, such as national newspapers and public broadcasters. Trust in journalism proved central in mediating dissatisfaction and engagement, highlighting that distrust may reduce scientists' media involvement and, in turn, weaken public trust in science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Understanding of Science
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625261416830
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trust undone: How COVID-19 coverage shaped scientists’ trust in journalism and their willingness to engage with the media

Frank Marcinkowski, Sarah Kohler, Hella de Haas
Public Understanding of Science
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

Trust undone: How COVID-19 coverage shaped scientists’ trust in journalism and their willingness to engage with the media

Frank Marcinkowski, Sarah Kohler, Hella de Haas
article en

Abstract

This study explores how scientists' experiences during the pandemic influenced their trust in journalism and their willingness to engage with the media. The study employed a survey approach, collecting data from 4089 scientists affiliated with German universities and research institutions. Trust in journalism was measured across five dimensions: appropriate topic selection, accurate representation, proper fact selection, fair assessment, and desirable impact. Structural equation modeling was used to analyze the relationships between dissatisfaction with pandemic-era media coverage, trust in journalism, and scientists' willingness to engage in science communication. Results show that scientists' trust in news media is generally limited and varies across media types. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated distrust, particularly in media outlets expected to maintain high standards, such as national newspapers and public broadcasters. Trust in journalism proved central in mediating dissatisfaction and engagement, highlighting that distrust may reduce scientists' media involvement and, in turn, weaken public trust in science.

Public Understanding of Science
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Trust undone: How COVID-19 coverage shaped scientists’ trust in journalism and their willingness to engage with the media — Frank Marcinkowski, Sarah Kohler, et al. · Public Understanding of Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS