Machine Learning‐Based Evaluation of Roof Drifts and Accelerations of Reinforced Concrete Wall Buildings During Ground Motions

Reinforced concrete (RC) wall buildings are used worldwide for their demonstrated seismic performance in high seismicity areas. Presently, the nonlinear models used to calculate maximum roof drifts and acceleration during ground motions for these buildings are labor‐intensive and complex. This study proposes a machine learning‐based methodology to estimate these demand parameters. Random forests and neural networks were trained and tested on a dataset of over 160,000 ground motion analyses, assembled from 57 RC wall building archetypes modeled in OpenSeesPy, and each one subjected to 3000 ground motions of different intensities. Notably, the inputs use design information available from the building design process and ground motion parameters that are simple to estimate. The models obtained an R 2 coefficient of 0.72 and 0.76 predicting roof drifts and acceleration on the test buildings, respectively, underscoring its ability to provide rapid estimations of the response of RC wall buildings. The trained models can be accessed via the Python Package Index and a GitHub repository.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earthquake Spectra
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/esp4.70018
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning‐Based Evaluation of Roof Drifts and Accelerations of Reinforced Concrete Wall Buildings During Ground Motions

Carlos Angarita, Orlando Arroyo, Ricardo Bonett, Julián Carrillo et al.
Earthquake Spectra
Seismic Performance and Analysis
article

Machine Learning‐Based Evaluation of Roof Drifts and Accelerations of Reinforced Concrete Wall Buildings During Ground Motions

Carlos Angarita, Orlando Arroyo, Ricardo Bonett, Julián Carrillo, Carlos Montes
article en

Abstract

Reinforced concrete (RC) wall buildings are used worldwide for their demonstrated seismic performance in high seismicity areas. Presently, the nonlinear models used to calculate maximum roof drifts and acceleration during ground motions for these buildings are labor‐intensive and complex. This study proposes a machine learning‐based methodology to estimate these demand parameters. Random forests and neural networks were trained and tested on a dataset of over 160,000 ground motion analyses, assembled from 57 RC wall building archetypes modeled in OpenSeesPy, and each one subjected to 3000 ground motions of different intensities. Notably, the inputs use design information available from the building design process and ground motion parameters that are simple to estimate. The models obtained an R 2 coefficient of 0.72 and 0.76 predicting roof drifts and acceleration on the test buildings, respectively, underscoring its ability to provide rapid estimations of the response of RC wall buildings. The trained models can be accessed via the Python Package Index and a GitHub repository.

Earthquake SpectraVol. 42(1)
Universidad Industrial de Santander (CO), Universidad de La Sabana (CO), Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (US), Military University Nueva Granada (CO), Universidad de Medellín (CO)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Machine Learning‐Based Evaluation of Roof Drifts and Accelerations of Reinforced Concrete Wall Buildings During Ground Motions — Carlos Angarita, Orlando Arroyo, et al. · Earthquake Spectra (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS