Physiology-guided personalized mechanical ventilation to prevent ventilator-induced lung injury

Mechanical ventilation is essential for managing acute respiratory failure, yet it carries a significant risk of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Lung-protective ventilation, most notably through the use of low tidal volumes, has improved outcomes in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), but these conventional strategies do not fully account for the profound heterogeneity of the injured lung or the variability in patient-specific physiology. Although tidal volumes of 4-8 ml/kg predicted body weight (PBW) provide a general reference for limiting strain, truly protective ventilation requires individualization based on regional aeration, compliance, and recruitability. Variability in these parameters leads to uneven distributions of stress and strain, while dynamic changes in respiratory drive, inspiratory effort, and cardiopulmonary interactions further complicate uniform ventilatory management. The mechanisms underlying VILI: barotrauma, volutrauma, atelectrauma, and biotrauma extend beyond the lung parenchyma and contribute to ventilator-associated diaphragm dysfunction and secondary organ injury. Bedside physiological tools, including esophageal manometry, electrical impedance tomography, and lung ultrasound, allow real-time evaluation of lung stress, regional ventilation, recruitability, and patient effort. When incorporated into clinical decision-making, these modalities facilitate individualized adjustments aimed at avoiding overdistension and collapse, limiting injurious pressures and volumes, and maintaining adequate gas exchange and hemodynamic stability. Advances in technology, such as closed-loop ventilation systems, adaptive control algorithms, and computational modeling, offer additional opportunities to refine personalized strategies and anticipate harmful mechanical patterns. Collectively, physiology-guided, personalized mechanical ventilation shifts practice from protocol-driven approaches to patient-centered care, with the overarching goal of mitigating VILI and improving outcomes in critically ill patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Medicine
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1764151
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
36.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physiology-guided personalized mechanical ventilation to prevent ventilator-induced lung injury

Raffaele Merola, Marcus J. Schultz, Patricia R. M. Rocco, Denise Battaglini
1 citations
Frontiers in Medicine
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
36.44
article

Physiology-guided personalized mechanical ventilation to prevent ventilator-induced lung injury

Raffaele Merola, Marcus J. Schultz, Patricia R. M. Rocco, Denise Battaglini
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Mechanical ventilation is essential for managing acute respiratory failure, yet it carries a significant risk of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Lung-protective ventilation, most notably through the use of low tidal volumes, has improved outcomes in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), but these conventional strategies do not fully account for the profound heterogeneity of the injured lung or the variability in patient-specific physiology. Although tidal volumes of 4-8 ml/kg predicted body weight (PBW) provide a general reference for limiting strain, truly protective ventilation requires individualization based on regional aeration, compliance, and recruitability. Variability in these parameters leads to uneven distributions of stress and strain, while dynamic changes in respiratory drive, inspiratory effort, and cardiopulmonary interactions further complicate uniform ventilatory management. The mechanisms underlying VILI: barotrauma, volutrauma, atelectrauma, and biotrauma extend beyond the lung parenchyma and contribute to ventilator-associated diaphragm dysfunction and secondary organ injury. Bedside physiological tools, including esophageal manometry, electrical impedance tomography, and lung ultrasound, allow real-time evaluation of lung stress, regional ventilation, recruitability, and patient effort. When incorporated into clinical decision-making, these modalities facilitate individualized adjustments aimed at avoiding overdistension and collapse, limiting injurious pressures and volumes, and maintaining adequate gas exchange and hemodynamic stability. Advances in technology, such as closed-loop ventilation systems, adaptive control algorithms, and computational modeling, offer additional opportunities to refine personalized strategies and anticipate harmful mechanical patterns. Collectively, physiology-guided, personalized mechanical ventilation shifts practice from protocol-driven approaches to patient-centered care, with the overarching goal of mitigating VILI and improving outcomes in critically ill patients.

Frontiers in MedicineVol. 13
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Intensive Care Foundation (AU), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), University of Oxford (GB), Pain Management Institute (US), Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biophysics (CZ), Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (TH), Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (IT), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), University of Genoa (IT), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
36.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.