In-hospital resuscitation treatments and neurological outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during national academic meeting days: a nationwide retrospective study in Japan

Background: Medical professionals often attend national academic meetings, which may temporarily reduce available human resources and potentially worsen outcomes for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). This study investigated whether the proportion of patients with OHCA who received in-hospital resuscitation treatments differed during meeting days compared to non-meeting days. Methods: This nationwide, retrospective, observational study utilized data from the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine-Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (JAAM-OHCA) registry recorded between 2014 and 2021. Adult patients who experienced OHCA on meeting days were defined as the exposure group, while those who on the same calendar days one week before and after were designated as the control group. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients receiving targeted temperature management (TTM), extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) and coronary angiography (CAG), assessed using multiple logistic regression analysis. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Results: Among 3932 patients (1357 in the meeting days and 2575 in the non-meeting days), in-hospital resuscitation treatments showed no significant differences: TTM (5.5% [75/1357] vs. 5.6% [143/2575]; adjusted OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.84–1.59), ECPR (3.8% [51/1357] vs. 4.0% [103/2575]; adjusted OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.86–1.85), and CAG (7.4% [101/1357] vs. 6.4% [164/2575]; adjusted OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.68–1.27). The proportion of 1-month survival with favorable neurological outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups. Conclusions: There was no significant difference in in-hospital resuscitation treatments between patients who experienced OHCA during meeting days and non-meeting days.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Resuscitation Plus
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2026.101271
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In-hospital resuscitation treatments and neurological outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during national academic meeting days: a nationwide retrospective study in Japan

Sho Oka, Koki Nakada, Tadaharu Shiozumi, Satoshi Nakajima et al.
Resuscitation Plus
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

In-hospital resuscitation treatments and neurological outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during national academic meeting days: a nationwide retrospective study in Japan

Sho Oka, Koki Nakada, Tadaharu Shiozumi, Satoshi Nakajima, Yuki Miyamoto, Makoto Watanabe, Tetsuhisa Kitamura, Tasuku Matsuyama, Kosuke Kiyohara
article en

Abstract

Background: Medical professionals often attend national academic meetings, which may temporarily reduce available human resources and potentially worsen outcomes for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). This study investigated whether the proportion of patients with OHCA who received in-hospital resuscitation treatments differed during meeting days compared to non-meeting days. Methods: This nationwide, retrospective, observational study utilized data from the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine-Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (JAAM-OHCA) registry recorded between 2014 and 2021. Adult patients who experienced OHCA on meeting days were defined as the exposure group, while those who on the same calendar days one week before and after were designated as the control group. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients receiving targeted temperature management (TTM), extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) and coronary angiography (CAG), assessed using multiple logistic regression analysis. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Results: Among 3932 patients (1357 in the meeting days and 2575 in the non-meeting days), in-hospital resuscitation treatments showed no significant differences: TTM (5.5% [75/1357] vs. 5.6% [143/2575]; adjusted OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.84–1.59), ECPR (3.8% [51/1357] vs. 4.0% [103/2575]; adjusted OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.86–1.85), and CAG (7.4% [101/1357] vs. 6.4% [164/2575]; adjusted OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.68–1.27). The proportion of 1-month survival with favorable neurological outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups. Conclusions: There was no significant difference in in-hospital resuscitation treatments between patients who experienced OHCA during meeting days and non-meeting days.

Resuscitation PlusVol. 28
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.