The origins of <scp>ESG</scp> demand: Evidence from retail and institutional investor responses to environmental rankings

Abstract This paper examines the origin of the demand for corporate environmental responsibility in capital markets by comparing the responses of retail and institutional investors to environmental information releases. Employing public green rankings for S&amp;P 500 firms, we show that retail investors respond positively to increases in public rankings by paying a green premium and increasing their holdings during the period when environmental, social and governance (ESG) investment was becoming increasingly popular. Conversely, increases in private green scores do not result in significant market reactions, indicating that institutional investors did not emphasize environmental protection in their investment decisions. A quasi‐natural experiment and robustness tests with institutional holdings provide additional support for this finding. This effect has disappeared in recent years, as demand from retail investors has been met by institutional options. Overall, this study provides evidence that retail investors are the primary drivers of early demand for environmental responsibility, providing important policy implications to incentivize institutional investors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Financial Economics
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rfe.70039
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The origins of ESG demand: Evidence from retail and institutional investor responses to environmental rankings

Leyuan You, Janet D. Payne
Review of Financial Economics
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

The origins of ESG demand: Evidence from retail and institutional investor responses to environmental rankings

Leyuan You, Janet D. Payne
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines the origin of the demand for corporate environmental responsibility in capital markets by comparing the responses of retail and institutional investors to environmental information releases. Employing public green rankings for S&amp;P 500 firms, we show that retail investors respond positively to increases in public rankings by paying a green premium and increasing their holdings during the period when environmental, social and governance (ESG) investment was becoming increasingly popular. Conversely, increases in private green scores do not result in significant market reactions, indicating that institutional investors did not emphasize environmental protection in their investment decisions. A quasi‐natural experiment and robustness tests with institutional holdings provide additional support for this finding. This effect has disappeared in recent years, as demand from retail investors has been met by institutional options. Overall, this study provides evidence that retail investors are the primary drivers of early demand for environmental responsibility, providing important policy implications to incentivize institutional investors.

Review of Financial EconomicsVol. 44(2)
Texas State University (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.